Government job creation programs deliver significant (net) long-term benefits — Bill Mitchell

On April 5, 1933, US President Roosevelt made an executive decision to create the – Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) – which was a component of the suite of government programs referred to as the – New Deal – that defined the Federal government’s solution to the mass unemployment that arose during the early years of the – Great Depression. These programs have been heavily criticised by the free market set as being unnecessary, wasteful and ineffective. Critics assert that no long-term benefits are forthcoming from such programs. However, those assertions are never backed by valid empirical evidence. A recent study by US academics has provided the first solid piece of evidence that the CCC delivered massive long-term benefits to the individuals who participated in it. And these benefits considerably outweigh the dollars outlaid by the government. I discuss that research today. The results also point to the effectiveness of a Job Guarantee program....

William Mitchell — Modern Monetary Theory

Government job creation programs deliver significant (net) long-term benefits
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia

MMT — debunking the deficit — Lars P. Syll

Lars comments on a quote from Stephanie Kelton's The Deficit Myth showing the loanable funds theory being inconsistent with stock-flow accounting.

Lars P. Syll’s Blog
MMT — debunking the deficit
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University

24 per cent annual interest on time deposits: St Petersburg Travel Notes, installment three — Gilbert Doctorow

Not much happening regarding MMT these days.

Herer is an anecdotal report on Russian banking. And, yes, you read that right. You get 24% not the bank.

Doctorow is an American residing in Brussels who spends a good deal of time in Russia. His wife is Russian and he is fluent in Russian. A "Russianist," he has a a PhD in history (Harvard) and is a retired business person. His reporting does not conform to the narrative.

Gilbert Doctorow—International relations, Russian affairs
24 per cent annual interest on time deposits: St Petersburg Travel Notes, installment three

Gilbert Doctorow

Did The Latest BRICS Summit Achieve Anything Of Tangible Significance At All? — Andrew Korybko

The conclusion is that it’s a lot easier to talk about creating truly alternative institutions than actually doing so, which means that BRICS will likely just remain a talking club, or a “multitasking laboratory of global governance” as Kortunov diplomatically described it. That’s not to downplay the group’s role since it’s important for major and developing non-Western countries to discuss pressing issues of the evolving world order, especially economic-financial ones, but that’s not the same as what enthusiasts expected.

A dose of reality. The Alt-Media got a quite a bit ahead of reality with respect to their expectations of the initial outcome.

The Kazan Summit therefore wasn’t a failure, and in fact, it succeeded in its only realistic goal all along of gathering its members and partners together to discuss ways to voluntarily accelerate financial multipolarity processes such as through the increased use of national currencies. The outcome was always going to be more symbolic than tangible due to the group’s purely voluntary nature, though some observers had false expectations and thus feel bitter, but now they know what BRICS is really about.  

Andrew Korybko's Newsletter

Did The Latest BRICS Summit Achieve Anything Of Tangible Significance At All?
Andrew Korybko