tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post5189281263045194601..comments2024-03-28T07:50:06.102-04:00Comments on Mike Norman Economics: John T. Harvey — Does Modern Monetary Theory Have Any Scholarly Validity?mike normanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03296006882513340747noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-18783869869007633342019-01-30T13:48:44.134-05:002019-01-30T13:48:44.134-05:00Noah Way is refuted on all counts by my farting t...Noah Way is refuted on all counts by my farting theory.<br />See cross-references<br />http://axecorg.blogspot.com/2017/07/fart-cross-references.htmlS400https://www.blogger.com/profile/01282349400341912187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-50729678421404299652019-01-30T12:26:24.341-05:002019-01-30T12:26:24.341-05:00Idiots. Everybody knows that
N = C + {fb(cm) . fb...Idiots. Everybody knows that<br /><br />N = C + {fb(cm) . fb(tc)} + fb(Ts) + fc . ta<br /><br />where <br /><br />fbs / fcs = functions of the bacon type<br />cm = condiments<br />tc = cooking time<br />Ts = temperature<br />ta = time taken to fill the sandwich<br />C = force (in Newtons) required to break the bacon<br /><br />Unlike some equations posted here (and elsewhere) this has been repeatedly tested and proven by experiment.Noah Wayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12012500819097539976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-30874517136580639042019-01-30T12:22:37.172-05:002019-01-30T12:22:37.172-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Noah Wayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12012500819097539976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-75157365583487227502019-01-30T09:19:46.625-05:002019-01-30T09:19:46.625-05:00The reply to Clint Ballinger got lost.
For the fu...The reply to Clint Ballinger got lost.<br /><br />For the full text see<br />https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2019/01/economics-as-storytelling-and.htmlAXEC / E.K-Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10402274109039114416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-87542296522733971652019-01-29T23:36:32.360-05:002019-01-29T23:36:32.360-05:00Oh, come oN Cracker-Jack-Hankie, you KNOW it is f(...Oh, come oN Cracker-Jack-Hankie, you KNOW it is f(yy)=a_0+∑(n=1)f^^X7^∞(a_n cos〖nπx/L〗+b_n sin〖nπx/L〗 )(-b±√(b^2-4ac))/2a = (x)=a_0+∑ =88. <br />You got it all wrong! Its my profit theory! See the following 400 links, they prove it! Oh, and your mom is fat and I hate everyone. <br />;) Clint Ballingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16484643778860969972noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-23982150644712798102019-01-29T23:31:26.526-05:002019-01-29T23:31:26.526-05:00Tom, funny you mention what got you into MMT here ...Tom, funny you mention what got you into MMT here – John T Harvey is who got me into it. I came from Irving Fisher to Keen, and then to Harvey where the final switches went on on public finance. <br /><br />Also funny you mention that a book is needed – I do not claim to be MMT but I am trying to make a non-technical book that the public and students will actually read, and a book that actually that gets all the operational basics right. You, of course, have been kindly posting the draft chapters to it: <a href="https://clintballinger.wordpress.com/2019/01/14/1000-castaways-fundamentals-of-economics/" rel="nofollow">1000 CASTAWAYS: Fundamentals of Economics</a><br /><br /><br />Someone today on the Intro to MMT facebook page commented “When I was learning MMT, the primary focus of most everything I read and watched was on HPM and ‘credit money’ was not even mentioned. It took a while to figure out where the private banking system fit in with chartalism. Your story makes it super clear that the two systems are actually operating simultaneously and with very different goals, use cases, and pitfalls.”<br /><br />So I hope I am working in the right direction. And I would love for people here to check out what I am working on, at least until Kelton comes out with her book :) I am about to add two more chapters (Chapter 4 and 5) soon. Clint Ballingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16484643778860969972noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-51725073608823291892019-01-29T14:19:17.407-05:002019-01-29T14:19:17.407-05:00We know that MMT is a lie, and I am a genius becau...We know that MMT is a lie, and I am a genius because f(x)=a_0+∑(n=1)^∞(a_n cos〖nπx/L〗+b_n sin〖nπx/L〗 )(-b±√(b^2-4ac))/2a = (x)=a_0+∑ <b>=0</b><br /><br />Hedgehog CrackerJack-HankieKonradhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01739209449391854796noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-57022411659210743732019-01-29T12:13:56.873-05:002019-01-29T12:13:56.873-05:00Answer to ‘John T. Harvey ― Does Modern Monetary T...Answer to ‘John T. Harvey ― Does Modern Monetary Theory Have Any Scholarly Validity?’<br /><br />No.<br /><br />MMT is refuted on all counts, see cross-references<br />http://axecorg.blogspot.com/2017/07/mmt-cross-references.html<br /><br />Egmont Kakarot-HandtkeAXEC / E.K-Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10402274109039114416noreply@blogger.com