tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post2469569840099083440..comments2024-03-29T07:30:30.121-04:00Comments on Mike Norman Economics: Dan Kovalik — The Plot to Scapegoat Russia: How the CIA and the Deep State Have Conspired to Vilify Putinmike normanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03296006882513340747noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-12377707421433908002017-06-17T04:18:16.228-04:002017-06-17T04:18:16.228-04:00Looks good.
I battled it out on the Guardian Cif ...Looks good.<br /><br />I battled it out on the Guardian Cif the other day. Readers were putting up all this stuff about how bad Putin was. I said where's the evidence? One guy put out an article about all the Russians who had been allegedly murdered in Britain, but in most cases British police suspected no crime, but The Inquisitor said CIA evidence was different. When I looked into it, the Inquisitor also mentioned the Russian mafia. So I did an internet search and discovered that it was definitely the Russian mafia and some government officials. Officials could mean anyone, bureaucrats, civil servants. <br /><br /><br />I spent a good hour counteracting all the anti Putin bias. So, some Russians in the UK were involved in organised crime, or were witnesses for a stolen £300,000. But where's the link to Putin? It's all propaganda. I wished I had thought of it, but I should have mentioned the Clinton body count. Now if I had made an allegation the Guardian would have removed my post. But I should have said, look at the amount of people who have died around the Clintons, but is the press pointing the finger? But the point is, you can have a lot of organised crime in the top end of politics, but this doesn't mean to say that any politicians were involved. I could have nailed them all. Kaiveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04195639305785321786noreply@blogger.com