tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post5134615689786495579..comments2024-03-28T07:50:06.102-04:00Comments on Mike Norman Economics: Peter Coy - A Beginner’s Guide to MMTmike normanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03296006882513340747noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-36194045884303914612019-03-22T07:31:22.243-04:002019-03-22T07:31:22.243-04:00Ralph, Mosler has written a lot about bank regulat...Ralph, Mosler has written a lot about bank regulation; it’s just scattered around. And if the FT article was by MMTers, then that’s MMT thinking, whether you like it ir not. There’s entire MMT conferences, and those conferences do not consist of people parroting what Mitchell and Mosler wrote.Brian Romanchukhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02699198289421951151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-16206687447575132262019-03-22T05:53:18.296-04:002019-03-22T05:53:18.296-04:00Complete bullshit. I’ve been reading stuff by Warr...Complete bullshit. I’ve been reading stuff by Warren Mosler and Bill Mitchell for ten years and I don’t remember them saying anything much about “breaking up monopolies and “stopping banks making too many loans””. <br /><br />As the authors of the Bloomberg article admit, they got the idea about monopolies and banks from a Financial Times article, which itself was not representative of MMT thinking.<br /><br />Morover, it’s pretty obvious that we need to control monopolies and cartels as best we can whether we adopt MMT or not. Ergo controlling monopolies and cartels has nothing specifically to do with MMT. <br />Ralph Musgravehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09443857766263185665noreply@blogger.com