tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post6437020701583388577..comments2024-03-29T02:17:06.175-04:00Comments on Mike Norman Economics: Sabine Hossenfelder - All you need to know to understand 5G mike normanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03296006882513340747noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-35201602496175838772020-12-21T06:09:27.502-05:002020-12-21T06:09:27.502-05:00That's interesting, thanks!That's interesting, thanks! Kaiveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04195639305785321786noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2761684730989137546.post-13799215878525862612020-12-20T17:11:37.220-05:002020-12-20T17:11:37.220-05:00Quoting from the New York Times:
The 5G Health Ha...Quoting from the New York Times:<br /><br /><b>The 5G Health Hazard That Isn’t</b><br /><br />How one scientist and his inaccurate chart led to unwarranted fears of wireless technology.<br /><br />Except that Dr. Curry and his graph got it wrong.<br /><br />According to experts on the biological effects of electromagnetic radiation, radio waves become safer at higher frequencies, not more dangerous. (Extremely high-frequency energies, such as X-rays, behave differently and do pose a health risk.)<br /><br />In his research, Dr. Curry looked at studies on how radio waves affect tissues isolated in the lab, and misinterpreted the results as applying to cells deep inside the human body. His analysis failed to recognize the protective effect of human skin. At higher radio frequencies, the skin acts as a barrier, shielding the internal organs, including the brain, from exposure. Human skin blocks the even higher frequencies of sunlight.<br /><br />“It doesn’t penetrate,” said Christopher M. Collins, a professor of radiology at New York University who studies the effect of high-frequency electromagnetic waves on humans. Dr. Curry’s graph, he added, failed to take into account “the shielding effect.”<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html" rel="nofollow">The 5G Health Hazard That Isn’t</a>Ahmed Fareshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07105255828394485657noreply@blogger.com