Showing posts with label loanable funds theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label loanable funds theory. Show all posts

Monday, April 22, 2019

Lars P. Syll — Schumpeter–an early champion of MMT


Keeper quote from Joseph Schumpeter. He nailed endogenous money as "credit money" and observed correctly how "money" gets created by banks' extending credit — "they create deposits in their act of lending." This effect is now amplified through non-bank and quasi-bank financial institutions.

The contemporary financialized economy runs largely on privately created credit. This has an even greater effect than Schumpeter likely anticipated. Economists' ignoring this unduly limit the scope of their models by failing to include money & banking, and finance. The result is "surprise resulting from exogenous shock." In other words, the conventional economists were looking in the wrong direction owning to oversimplification of their models of an economy. 

To say that this resulted in "great embarrassment of the profession in the fallout from the global financial crisis would be an understatement. But conventional economists still have not dealt with it by including a correct approach to money & banking and finance. Nor have institutional arrangement been changed to prevent a repeat, perhaps on an even grander scale.

Hyman Minsky was a student of Schumpter at Harvard. Minsky drew out some conclusions from Schumpter's view that became the financial instability hypothesis. Randy Wray, MMT economist and perhaps the most published author on theory of money, was a student of Minsky.

Although Schumpeter eschewed being associated with any particular economic school of thought, he is often considered as belonging to the Austrian school of economics and he was an Austrian national. Hyman Minsky also eschewed association with a particular economic school, but he is often characterized as a Post Keynesian.

MMT has roots in many previous economists and economic schools, although it is usually associated with the Post Keynesian. But here is Wray associated with Schumpeter through Minsky. MMT economists also acknowledge their debt to Abba Lerner, a student of Friedrich Hayek who is generally associated with the Austrian school of economics, too.

Incidentally, the chapter in which this quote occurs is worth reading in full. Here is the citation:

Joseph Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis, Allen & Unwin, 1954, reprinted by Tayor & Francis, 1986, p. 1080
in CHAPTER 8 Money, Credit, and Cycles, 7. BANK CREDIT AND THE ‘CREATION’ OF DEPOSITS, pp. 1076-1083.

Schumpeter doesn't take credit for originality in this, citing Keynes's Theory of Money, for example. He does criticize Keynes for again mudding the waters in the General Theory. See footnote on page 1080.

Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Schumpeter — an early champion of MMT
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Lars P. Syll’s Blog Krugman vs Kelton on the fiscal-monetary tradeoff


The battle of the titans. Or maybe better, David and Goliath.
We have to free ourselves from the loanable funds theory — and scholastic gibbering about ZLB — and start using good old Keynesian fiscal policies. Keynes — as did Lerner, Kaldor, Kalecki, and Robinson — showed that it was possible to promote economic growth with an “appropriate size of the budget deficit.” The stimulus a well-functioning fiscal policy aimed at full employment may have on investment and productivity does not necessarily have to be offset by higher interest rates.
Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Krugman vs Kelton on the fiscal-monetary tradeoff
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Lars P. Syll — Kalecki and Keynes on the loanable funds fallacy


Banks are not intermediaries between savers and borrowers, and finance is not allocating existing savings to future investment.

The opposite is true. Bank credit is self-funding; in credit extension, loans (assets) create deposits (liabilities). In finance as allocation of capital, investment creates saving.

Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Kalecki and Keynes on the loanable funds fallacy
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University

Thursday, October 26, 2017

Steve Roth — The Mysterious Stock of “Loanable Funds”

What follows is very unorthodox thinking even among the heterodox. It’s well beyond and different from MMT’s utterly convincing takedowns of “loanable funds” notions, for instance.
So take it as the ravings of an internet econocrank, if you will. But here it is FWIW....
Asymptosis
The Mysterious Stock of “Loanable Funds”
Steve Roth

Friday, October 21, 2016

Matias Vernengo — Nominal and Real Interest Rates

This seems to suggest to me that the explanation must be related to the short term nominal rate, which is a policy decision of the central bank, rather than something that affects the levels of inflation, and according to some theories (the loanable funds) what that does to savings. If I'm right then, the cause of the low rates is the financial excess of the last three decades, that forced central banks to keep rates low to save the economy, and preclude further problems. Very unlikely that would change any time soon.
Naked Keynesianism
Nominal and Real Interest Rates
Matias Vernengo | Associate Professor of Economics, Bucknell University

Sunday, December 20, 2015

circuit — Loanable Funds Theories: Classical vs Keynesian

One of the biggest fallacies in macroeconomics and macro policy is the idea that the interest rate is determined by the intersection of the upward sloping supply curve of (desired) savings and downward sloping curve of (desired) investment....
Fictional Reserve Barking
Loanable Funds Theories: Classical vs Keynesian
circuit

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Dirk Ehnts — Association of German banks: loanable funds theory fails

The Association of German banks has released a press statement (in German) which is very interesting. According to a survey, Germans keep their wealth in the form of bank deposits at different maturities even though interest rates are low. This empirical fact invalidates neoclassical theory that says that savers save less when interest rates are low and more when interest rates are high. The typical savings schedule is upward-sloping in an interest rate/savings space. In reality, savings do not seem to depend on the interest rate as the amount of savings (income not spend) has not fallen in the last years when interest rates in the euro area went down to zero.…
econoblog 101
Association of German banks: loanable funds theory fails
Dirk Ehnts | Berlin School for Economics and Law