Sunday, July 29, 2018

Oleg Komlik — The Sociology of Quantification: Seeing like Numbers


Short and important.

Economic Sociology and Political Economy
The Sociology of Quantification: Seeing like Numbers
Oleg Komlik | founder and editor-in-chief of the ES/PE, Chairman of the Junior Sociologists Network at the International Sociological Association, a PhD Candidate in Economic Sociology in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Ben-Gurion University, and a Lecturer in the School of Behavioral Sciences at the College of Management Academic Studies

See also

Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
Revisiting “Is the scientific paper a fraud?”
Andrew Gelman | Professor of Statistics and Political Science and Director of the Applied Statistics Center, Columbia University

Teodrose Fikre — Et Tu Bernie?


Sunday political sermon.

Amen.

Ghion Journa
Et Tu Bernie?Teodrose Fikre is the editor and founder of the Ghion Journal. 

See also
That the President of the United States is a Russian asset needs to be openly acknowledged. He may be a naive, negligent or unwitting asset, a coerced asset, or a willing and enthusiastic asset, or some combination thereof, but at this point there is no getting around that he is a Russian asset.

My readers who have followed me from progressive blogs presumably have no trouble accepting this. But I know that I also have many readers from investment or economic sources, many of whom are probably Republicans. To them I ask two simple questions: (1) in what way has he acted in any way inconsistent with being a Russian asset? and (2) if you evaluated him the same way you evaluated SEC and other filings in order to determine whether or not to purchase a stock, to what conclusion would you come?….
The rest is alll inference, no evidence.

The Bondad Blog
The President of the United States is a Russian assetNewDeal Democrat


Tyler Durden - "An Unparalleled Economic & Political Crisis": Brexit Optimism Collapses As Ministers Fear "Historic Catastrophe"




“I have near zero optimism because I think it is going to be very messy,” warned one UK minister, speaking to Bloomberg on condition of anonymity. The prospects of getting an agreement are slim, the minister said. “If we crash out without a deal, it’s going to be a historic catastrophe."

And he is not alone as the latest YouGov polls show 69% of Brits believe Brexit is going badly and the largest finger of blame for Brexit going badly is being pointed at the government. Two thirds (68%) of those who think Brexit is currently going badly say that it is the government’s fault. This includes three quarters who voted Remain (77%) and 58% of Leave voters.
Additionally, as TruePublica.org notes, with lots of talk of preparing for a no-deal Brexit, the possibilities of the Tory party completely disintegrating in 2019 becomes ever-more real. The electorate is now becoming very nervous of what Brexit may bring, given that the Conservatives have no idea themselves, which means it should be no surprise that Theresa May’s favorability score plummets to new low.
It should be noted that, as stated above, those turning against the Prime Minister appear to be Leave voters. The only truly amazing statistic about Theresa May is that at the summer recess – she’s still Prime Minister. And few would have bet on that at any odds just six months ago.
Perhaps even more ominously, for the first time ever, more people support a second referendum - 42% of Britons think there should be a referendum on the terms of the Brexit deal, 40% do not.
Zero Hedge

Tyler Durden - "An Unparalleled Economic & Political Crisis": Brexit Optimism Collapses As Ministers Fear "Historic Catastrophe"r
                                 
                                                             *********

I'm not an economist, but I do try to work things out, so I was wondering how we could bring some of the industry back to the West, but then I could see there might be a problem with inflation unless we use more automaton.

I bought some tee shirts the other day for two for £8, and I wondered about the low wages of the people that made them. Then I had a thought experiment: Imagine if Western companies found another country where all the clothing for the UK market could be made at a fraction of the price so that the cost of clothing came down by 50%?

Now imagine that NGO's had campaigned to improve the wages of the workers in that country so that the following year the cost of all cloths shott up by 100%? Now imagine what the economists and the media would say: Inflation running at 100% in clothing!, would scream the headlines. People would get worried about becoming poorer and how to make ends meet unless wages go up, which never seem to, and pensioners on fixed pensions would worry that their pensions might not be worth all that much in the future. And yet if the low cost producer had never been found no one would have concerned themselves over the price of clothes. I could then see how difficult it was to reverse globalisation, and also, how difficult it is for Britain to leave the EU.

Now imagine if globalisation had never occurred? Western factories would be more fully automated and there would be more skilled people, with stronger unions so wages would be higher? I wonder what our standard of living would be like. If we were  poorer because we were not exploiting workers in the third world would we care as we wouldn't know any different? But there would be less immigration and houses would be far cheaper while the councils may still have been building housing estates reducing demand to buy a home, so we might have all be a lot better off. Even if it turned out we were poorer, the hourly week would have been reduced and work would have been less authoritarian. I think we would have been a lot happier. KV

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Martin Armstrong — Magnitsky Act is Back

Apparently, when the film first appeared, there were only 46 views. After our post, it exceeded 20,000. It was then pulled, of course. Here is the new link. Let’s see how long this one will last.
Armstrong Economics
Magnitsky Act is Back
Martin Armstrong

Steven Pearlstein - The junk debt that tanked the economy? It's back in a big way.

Loans to highly indebted businesses — that are packaged into securities — are up 38 percent this year.

Was further deteriorating the banking sector a good idea? Whose idea was it anyway? KV


Like most people, you probably assume that the level of lending done by banks at any moment is largely driven by how much demand there is from borrowers. But in the world of modern finance, that’s only part of the story. For just as important is the level of demand from investors — pension funds, hedge funds, mutual funds, sovereign wealth funds and insurance companies — to buy the loans that banks make. Indeed, there are times when there’s so much demand for loans from investors and the profit from selling them is so lucrative that bankers are only too happy to go out and make bigger and riskier loans than they would if they were keeping them on their own books.
That was the situation back in 2006 when investors were so keen to own “mortgage-backed securities” that Wall Street was begging lenders for more and more “product.” You know how that turned out.
Now it is happening again, as investors and money managers scramble to buy floating-rate debt — debt offering interest payments that will increase as global interest rates rise, as they are expected to over the next few years. A big new source of floating-rate credit is the market for “leveraged loans” — loans to highly indebted businesses — that are packaged into securities known as “collateralized loan obligations,” or CLOs. Because the market seems to have an insatiable appetite for CLOs, leveraged lending and CLO issuance through the first half of the year are already up 38 percent over last year’s near-record levels.
Credit-rating companies such as Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s have recently warned that this surge in corporate borrowing and lending has led to a noticeable decline in the quality of the loans. The borrowers have lower credit ratings. The loans contain fewer of the standard conditions that are meant to protect lenders. And the rating companies calculate that lenders should expect to recover less of their money if the borrowers default or go into bankruptcy.
For the most part, however, these warnings have gone unheeded. Although some sophisticated investors have begun to pull back from the CLO market, they have been replaced by retail investors seeking higher yields who have flocked to mutual funds and exchange-traded funds that specialize in CLO debmiss.
Many of the borrowers in the leveraged loan market are midsize companies that most people have never heard of. But some are large companies that you would recognize — Dell, Tesla, Uber, BMC Software, Japan’s SoftBank and office-sharing company WeWork. What they all have in common is that they already have so much debt that their credit rating is below investment grade, or “junk” as it is known on Wall Street. In effect, they are the “subprime” borrowers in the corporate loan market.
The Washington Post

Sputnik — 'No Matter What': US Poised to Deploy Space-Based Weapons by 2020 – Reports


Space wars is here. That should quickly rack up trillions for the "defense" industry aka the military-industrial complex (you remember, the one that Ike warned about).

Sputnik International
'No Matter What': US Poised to Deploy Space-Based Weapons by 2020 – Reports

See also

Russian Defense Industry Reveals Time Frame for Delivery of New Strategic Arms

Reuters — Hungarian PM sees shift to illiberal Christian democracy in 2019 European vote


Traditionalism is on the rise and it's taking a bite out of liberalism. This wave is not unique to Hungary.
In an annual speech to ethnic Hungarians in Baile Tusnad in neighboring Romania, Orban portrayed the 2019 European parliamentary vote as decisive for the future of Europe.
He said the Western political “elite” of the EU had failed to protect the bloc from Muslim immigration and it was time for them to go. “The European elite is visibly nervous,” Orban told hundreds of cheering supporters.

“Their big goal to transform Europe, to ship it into a post-Christian era, and into an era when nations disappear - this process could be undermined in the European elections. And it is our elementary interest to stop this transformation.”...
“Christian democracy is not liberal...It is illiberal, if you like,” Orban said....
The historical dialectic chugs along.

Reuters
Hungarian PM sees shift to illiberal Christian democracy in 2019 European vote
Staff

See also
Steve Bannon plans to lead a populist revolt throughout Europe which, if successful, will crush George Soros and his network of open-border NGO's to smithereens, according to the Daily Beast....
Zero Hedge
Bannon Sets Up For EU Showdown With George Soros
Tyler Durden

Friday, July 27, 2018

Lee Camp — American Society Would Collapse If It Weren’t for These 8 Myths


Things to contemplate while you are at the beach this weekend.

Truthdig
American Society Would Collapse If It Weren’t for These 8 Myths
Lee Camp

Paul Fitzgerald and Elizabeth Gould — The Grand Illusion of Imperial Power

Few Americans today understand how the United States came to be owned by a London-backed neoconservative/right-wing alliance that grew out of the institutional turmoil of the post-Vietnam era. Even fewer understand how its internal mission to maintain the remnants of the old British Empire gradually overcame American democracy and replaced it with a “national security” bureaucracy of its own design....
Weekend reading, if you like intrigue.

Disclaimer: I can't voucher for the factual claims, but I assume that the Counterpunch editors did due diligence before accepting it.

Counterpunch
The Grand Illusion of Imperial Power
Paul Fitzgerald and Elizabeth Gould

Ellis Winningham — How to Draw Unique and Entertaining Comparisons to Express MMT Concepts

People always ask me how I come up with interesting and fun analogies to teach MMT. So, I thought it would be fun to address that question. Now then, when you ask that question, you’re basically asking me to describe how my mind works. That’s kind of hard to explain. I do think in very unusual ways, but I’ll give it a go....
Ellis Winningham — MMT and Modern Macroeconomics
How to Draw Unique and Entertaining Comparisons to Express MMT Concepts
Ellis Winningham

See also

On the Use of the Ubiquitous Term “Printing Money” by MMT Novices – Please Stop Using It

M. K. Bhadrakumar — Trump Has a Grand Strategy, He Wants to Do a 'Reverse Nixon' -- Partner Russia for an Alliance vs China


Pulling a Kissinger. But coming from a country that can't keep an agreement…?

And if an agreement were viable, what could go wrong? Bhadrakumar explains.

Russia Insider
Trump Has a Grand Strategy, He Wants to Do a 'Reverse Nixon' -- Partner Russia for an Alliance vs China
Scott Ritter

also

Like Chuck Schumer said would happen.
"Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you." —Sen. Charles Schumer to MSNBC host Rachel Maddow
Trump Has Been Set Up, Framed and Relentlessly Persecuted by the American Intelligence Community
Sidney Powell

Andre Vltchek — Releasing My North Korean Documentary Film to My Readers


Download it before it disappears.

NEO
Releasing My North Korean Documentary Film to My Readers
Andre Vltchek

Daniel Oberhaus — Meet the Anarchists Making Their Own Medicine

“So yeah, we are encouraging people to break the law,” Laufer added. “If you're going to die and you're being denied the medicine that can save you, would you rather break the law and live, or be a good upstanding citizen and a corpse?”
Power to the people!

Motherboard
Meet the Anarchists Making Their Own Medicine
Daniel Oberhaus
ht Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism

Max J. Zenglein — Europe needs to stand up to China’s state capitalist model


Capitalism is feeling the heat.

Wait, wasn't capitalism supposed to bury socialism in competition? 

Oh, I see, China is not playing "fairly."

ROFLMAO.

MERICS — Mercator Institute for China Studies
Europe needs to stand up to China’s state capitalist model
Max J. Zenglein

Jim Carey — Mexico’s Case Against NAFTA: An Economic and Environmental Wrecking Ball

So is Mexico so eager to open talks with the U.S. on NAFTA if it was “the worst deal ever approved” by Washington? A deal that was helping Mexico get one over on their neighbors to the north. The answer likely has something to do with the devastation that neoliberal “free trade” brings with it wherever it goes. 
Like most countries before they embraced neoliberalism, Mexico before NAFTA was once home to a diverse and robust domestic agricultural sector, less reliant on imported food and manufacturing jobs, and on track to have a fairly Western standard of living. Since the massive trade treaty took effect in 1994, however, this all changed.  Instead, NAFTA set off a series of devastating policies that are still ravaging Mexico today....
Geopolitics Alert
Mexico’s Case Against NAFTA: An Economic and Environmental Wrecking Ball
Jim Carey

See also
Erdoğan in September had called on Washington to swap Brunson for Fethullah Gülen, a Turkish Muslim cleric living in self-imposed exile in the US who Erdoğan and his Justice and Development Party (AKP) government accuse of orchestrating a failed coup in 2016....
Is the Trump administration trying to end Turkish membership in NATO and deepen the divide between the Global North and Global South, and East and West? First, drive Russian into China's arms, then Iran, then Turkey, all of which are armed to the teeth. Sounds like a brilliant strategy.

Trump, Pence Threaten Turkey with ‘Large Sanctions’ if US Pastor not Released
Turkish Minute

Martin Armstrong — Magnitsky Act & the Cover-Up of Unprecedented Corruption


Not only Browder but other American predators preying on Russia in the Yeltsin years. Armstrong saw it up close as an investor in Browder's fund, Hermitage Capital.

Armstrong Economics
Magnitsky Act & the Cover-Up of Unprecedented Corruption

Thursday, July 26, 2018

Ben Wray — The magic money tree is real: Treasury confirms taxes are not needed to fund government spending

A LETTER from the Economic Secretary of the Treasury has confirmed that the government does not need to raise money from taxation to fund government spending, leading to advocates of increased public investment to declare “the magic money tree exists, as a matter of fact”....
The argument goes that the government can only spend what it has raised in taxation, with any additional financing having to be raised through debt from financial markets which subsequently has to be repaid. Former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher famously said “The government has no money of its own. It’s all your money.”
But Treasury secretary John Glen’s 18 July reply to Peter May, a Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) advocate who had written to his MP Ben Bradshaw last year to inquire of the Chancellor as to where money came from, was in contrast to Thatcher’s position.
Glen answered: “While it is theoretically possible for monetary authorities to finance fiscal deficits through the creation of money, allowing governments to increase spending or reduce taxation, without raising corresponding financing from the private sector, there is a risk that money financing could rapidly undermine the stability of inflation expectations.”...

John Helmer — The Helsinki Referendum For Donbass – Putin Opts For No-Win, No-Lose; Us Rejects Swap Of Donbass For Crimea


Only for those interested in a detailed backgrounder about where things stand now from someone that understands both English and Russian and it acquainted with the sources.

Longish, and requires some background already.

Dances with Bears
The Helsinki Referendum For Donbass – Putin Opts For No-Win, No-Lose; Us Rejects Swap Of Donbass For Crimea
John Helmer

Popular Resistance — Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega to Telesur: ‘The Coup Was Defeated’

Ortega says that the country has experienced extreme violence over the past several months at the hands of the “extreme right” of Nicaragua and U.S. elected officials who have always opposed the Sandinista revolution since it emerged in the 1980s.
The president went on to say that the violence is the fruit of U.S. officials who are working with poor paramilitaries within the country who want to knock down the Sandinistas.
Popular Resistance
Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega to Telesur: ‘The Coup Was Defeated’
Staff, Telesur

Liz Alderman - Portugal Dared to Cast Aside Austerity. It’s Having a Major Revival.

It seems that the socialists do better capitalism than the conservatives do, well at least in Portugal. Businesses are now flourishing. You see, conservative parties, like the British Conservative Party and New labour, are only interested in serving the elite. KV


LISBON — Ramón Rivera had barely gotten his olive oil business started in the sun-swept Alentejo region of Portugal when Europe’s debt crisis struck. The economy crumbled, wages were cut, and unemployment doubled. The government in Lisbon had to accept a humiliating international bailout.
But as the misery deepened, Portugal took a daring stand: In 2015, it cast aside the harshest austerity measures its European creditors had imposed, igniting a virtuous cycle that put its economy back on a path to growth. The country reversed cuts to wages, pensions and social security, and offered incentives to businesses.

The government’s U-turn, and willingness to spend, had a powerful effect. Creditors railed against the move, but the gloom that had gripped the nation through years of belt-tightening began to lift. Business confidence rebounded. Production and exports began to take off — including at Mr. Rivera’s olive groves.

The renewal is visible just about everywhere. Hotels, restaurants and shops have opened in droves, fueled by a tourism surge that has helped cut unemployment in half. In the Beato district of Lisbon, a mega-campusfor start-ups rises from the rubble of a derelict military factory. Bosch, Google and Mercedes-Benz recently opened offices and digital research centers here, collectively employing thousands.

Foreign investment in aerospace, construction and other sectors is at a record high. And traditional Portuguese industries, including textiles and paper mills, are putting money into innovation, driving a boom in exports.

Voters ushered Mr. Costa, a center-left leader, into power in late 2015 after he promised to reverse cuts to their income, which the previous government had approved to reduce Portugal’s high deficit under the terms of an international bailout of 78 billion euros, or $90 billion. Mr. Costa formed an unusual alliance with Communist and radical-left parties, which had been shut out of power since the end of Portugal’s dictatorship in 1974. They united with the goal of beating back some of the toughest aspects of austerity, while balancing the books to meet eurozone rules.

New York Times

Tyler Cowen — Which happiness results are robust?


Tyler Cowen comments on a paper, and Barkley Rosser, who is not an author of the paper but is interested in the issues, responds in the comments. (Ignore the trolls in the comments.)

I agree with Barkley Rosser. Social phenomena are difficult to measure and subjectivity greatly complicates this. However, it doesn't invalidate all models any more than similar issues invalidate modeling in economics.

Where problems arise lies not so much in modeling and modeling decisions as in misinterpreting the implications of a model owing to unstated presumptions and hidden assumptions, or exceeding scope and confusing scale. Of course, choice of parameters, operational definition, etc., although there are many issues involved that can invalidate a model. Inadequate measurement protocol also can do so. 

Formal modeling complements conceptual modeling, which tend to be fuzzier. But conceptual modeling is also needed to encompass the full scope and deal with issues of scale, for example, by avoiding fallacies of composition. Moreover, formal modeling focuses on quantity, while conceptual modeling is also able to handle quality. Quality is often difficult to quantity.

Cognitive-affective bias and ideology also have to be considered, as some point out in the comments.

This discussion is particularly important from the economic point of view in that economics has traditionally been about "utility," which is a code word for satisfaction, with satisfaction related to happiness. Bentham's Utilitarianism is about not only individual good (micro scale), but also "the greater good of the greatest number" (macro scale).

Marginal Revolution
Which happiness results are robust?
Tyler Cowen | Holbert C. Harris Chair of Economics at George Mason University and serves as chairman and general director of the Mercatus Center

Sarah Berger - 4-day workweek is a success, New Zealand experiment finds

There's no two ways about, humans are cooperative creatures who like to help each other. KV

If productivity is plummeting in the workplace, the solution might be simple: Make the work week shorter.

One company did just that by experimenting with a four-day workweek. The trial was so successful, management is seeking to make the change permanent.
It also found an increased level of teamwork and collaboration (“employees describe how they felt a mutual willingness to ‘help each other out,’” reads the report).
“Many employees see the reduced working hours as ‘a gift’ and ‘a privilege not a right,’ and feel a deep sense of goodwill and reciprocity towards the organization, which manifests in an openness to ‘go the extra mile’ and think about ‘what I can do to give back,’” the qualitative analysis reads. “Many employees reported a willingness to be available for work purposes on their day off.”
Outside of work, employees reported other benefits, such as having more time to participate in family life, restore, reconnect and even explore and imagine.
As a result of the trial, Perpetual Guardian CEO Andrew Barnes has recommended to its board that the four-day workweek be made permanent.
CNBC

On the Economy — How Innovative Is China?

A few years ago, China overtook the U.S. and other innovative countries in terms of patent applications. More recently, it also became the leader in patent grants. But does this mean China is now the world leader in innovation? A recent Economic Synopsesessay explores this idea....
Short and informative.

FBRSL — On the Economy
How Innovative Is China?

Timothy Taylor — The Need for Generalists

One of the many political cliches that makes me die a little bit inside is when someone claims that all we need to address a certain problem (health care, poverty, transportation, the Middle East, whatever) is to bring together a group of experts who will provide the common-sense solution that we have all been ignoring. But while bringing together a group of specialist experts can provide a great deal of information and insight, they are often not especially good at melding their specific insights into a general policy.
Why every policy design problem of any significant size needs the participation of a generalist. Who are the generalists? Some are philosophers, in that philosophy property conceived studies the whole in terms of systems and conceptual modeling. Others are general systems theorists and systems thinkers. Lawyers are also generalists in institutional design. These are the disciplines that currently produced generalists. 

Many generalists are also specialists in a particular field. Kenneth Boulding, a co-founder of General systems Theory was an economist. Another co-founder Ludwig von Bertalanffy, who conceived the concept, was a biologist. 

In addition, most policy issues concern values that fall outside the expertise of most specialists. Policy solutions must not only "work" but also be viable. To often, viability is not a concern in the articulation of the policy design problem.

Conversable Economist
The Need for Generalists
Timothy Taylor | Managing editor of the Journal of Economic Perspectives, based at Macalester College in St. Paul, Minnesota

Tithi Bhattacharya and Susan Ferguson — Deepening our Understanding of Social Reproduction Theory

Probably not of interest to all but worth posting for those interested in a contemporary Marxian approach.
When we embarked on our project to explore Social Reproduction Theory (SRT), at the back of our mind was the phrase from the Marx and Engels’ German Ideology, ‘[human beings] must be in a position to live in order to be able to ‘make history’’. In class societies, since there lies between ‘living’ and ‘making history’ webs of social relations that enable and inhibit life, Marxism has always been about theorising both. Indeed, one can go as far as to say that historical materialism seeks to show how access, or lack thereof, to life-making resources in a class society shapes the making of history. SRT takes this question of life-making very seriously and that is, simply put, its specific inflection on Marxist theory as a whole.
But what is life-making exactly?
One way to answer that question is via the category of labour power, or the capacity to labour. Capitalism as a system is a unity of two kinds of social processes: the production of commodities and the production of workers who produce those commodities. Workers are ‘produced’ in a double sense, through biological reproduction and as bearers of labour power. SRT concerns itself with grasping the dynamics involved in both ‘productive’ processes....
Pluto Press
Deepening our Understanding of Social Reproduction Theory
Tithi Bhattacharya and Susan Ferguson

See also

Occasional Links & Commentary
Disappearing poverty
David F. Ruccio | Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame

Duncan Green — Why is Latin America Going Backwards?

Increasingly, however, academics and development practitioners are looking at a less visible and tangible obstacle – the capture of the State by economic and political elites. The extreme concentration of economic and political power reinforces the ability to unduly co-opt, corrupt and divert the democratic process, and influence the role of the State, perpetuating measures that reinforce privilege on the one hand and inequality and exclusion on the other. This elite capture is manifested in the ability to influence public policies, fiscal systems (regressive rather than progressive), and keep wages low (one in six workers with formal employment in the region live in poverty). It also leads to corruption and an erosion of democratic process, principle and institutions.
The UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) call it “the culture of privilege.” Latinobarometro in its 2017 report “Decline in Democracy”, refers to a ‘democratic diabetes’, an invisible illness that isn´t alarming in itself but slowly kills you. 75% of Latin Americans believe they are governed by an elite that rules for its own benefit.
There you have it.

Neoliberalism is a political theory based on elite capture of the state and using the state apparatus to further elite interests. It is a form of oligarchy (rule by a few) called "plutonomy," literally "the rule of wealth." "The culture of privilege" summarizes it aptly in sociological terms as a manifestation of downward causation in a system of networks, with the upper nodes controlling lower nodes.

What about "the failure of socialism"? Socialism was doing fine in the commodity boom, even with elite opposition support from abroad. When that boom ended and the economic situation shifted, elite interest saw a chance to regain control and the result has been destabilization, again with foreign support.

Oxfam Blogs — From Poverty to Power
Why is Latin America Going Backwards?
Duncan Green, strategic adviser for Oxfam GB

Bill Mitchell — Build it in Britain is just sensible logic

After my day in the sun as a poet, I am back to being an economist. I have been researching operational issues relating to how a society can take back control and Reclaim the State, as part of the work I am doing for our follow up book (with Thomas Fazi) that I hope to get out next year sometime. The current book Reclaiming the State: A Progressive Vision of Sovereignty for a Post-Neoliberal World (Pluto Books, 2017) is very conceptual. The Part 2 follow up will be conceptual in part but also operational. How to do it rather than what needs to be done. More specifically, I have been examining public procurement policies and how they have been captured by neoliberal interests to benefit capital at the expense of broader objectives (regional development, skill development, productivity growth, investment, employment, wages growth, etc). Over the last 3-4 decades, the way governments spend their money (contracting etc) has changed dramatically and governments have been bullied into acting as if they are ‘profit-maximising’ firms with no other agenda when making multi-billion dollar market purchases. However, in Britain this might change if British Labour are elected. Jeremy Corbyn announced this week that he was going to dramatically change the way the British government spends if he is elected. His ‘Build it in Britain’ strategy will scrap the narrow, neoliberal approaches to public procurement policies and instead use the spending capacity of government to advance broader goals. So while it might end up that a contract to a local firm requires higher government outlays, if that contract also delivers other benefits to the nation (as above) then the local firm would not be disadvantaged. Under the current ‘value for money’ hype local firms cannot ‘compete’ in many cases and these broader benefits are thus not generated. I see the ‘Build it in Britain’ strategy as an exercise in sensible logic and a major statement that the neoliberal command on British Labour is in retreat – for now anyway.
Dynamic efficiency instead of static efficiency. "Grow the pie" rather than "save money."

Bill Mitchell – billy blog
Build it in Britain is just sensible logic
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia

Philip Giraldi — Is Bill Browder the Most Dangerous Man in the World?

The darling of the war party needs to answer some questions
Update: The link to the film exposing Browder provided in this article has been taken down.

Unz Review
Is Bill Browder the Most Dangerous Man in the World?
Philip Giraldi, former CIA counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer, now Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest and founding member of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

Andrei Nekrasov - Russian Film Director censored by EU: Western media are misrepresenting Magnitsky - Browder case

The Andrei Nekrasov film that Tom posted here recently has been taken down, but someone has been brave enough to put it on YouTube, so just do a search for it before it's taken down too. Here, Andrei Nekrasov talks about his film.