MMR leaps ahead of MMT on the marketing front and web presence with a professionally designed site and now video up in record time.
No documentation of sources or original professional publications though. MMT way out ahead on that front, as is to be expected given the developmental time frame.
MMR gets good marks on professional presentation, meeting production value standard, and speed of ramp up, but needs to introduce greater professionalism wrt content.
MMT is way out front on content, and it has much wider and deeper web presence just beginning to be concerned with professional production. There is quite a bit of MMT video available, too, but much of it is not up to standard wrt production value.
Read it at Modern Monetary Realism
Understanding The Modern Monetary System – Video Series For Beginners
by Cullen Roche
Cullen continues to provide great PR for MMT.
ReplyDeleteFair dinkum. I'm still not having the MMR jab though.
Tom, are these videos original, or are they virtually the same as his old MMT videos, just scrubbed to delete MMT references?
ReplyDeleteDon't know any more about MMR video plans than you do, Joe. But I assume that MMR will be developing original material that fits that approach.
ReplyDeleteI thought the same thing Joe but I had a look, they're new.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJcgbizjecU
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KENCCGbPIsU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JQwZjL8ptE
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZNnAcE9aDk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-OySQy-4bE
our friend, cullen roche, remixed.
SR,
ReplyDelete'gotta love the yawning wombat! ;)
resp,
Art, and SR, But wasn't most of the content in the earlier videos and isn't most of the content in the new ones MMT without reference or citation? Even more specifically, isn't a lot of it just Warren Mosler?
ReplyDeleteI can't do a point-by-point because Cullen seems to have taken down the MMT videos.
To be honest I only looked at the opening thumbnail images, by some of the commentary the bathtub analogy is still used so you may be correct.
ReplyDelete