Pages

Pages

Monday, August 19, 2013

Interesting Outside Review Of MICC. Implications For The Looming "Value" Of Lockheed Martin et al

Commentary by Roger Erickson

Something to be aware of, if you're interested in emerging strategic options, not just archaic ideology.

Air/Land/Sea strategy leaders all replaced w officers who game the system, get merit badges, retire & work 4 industry

How does a sane citizen invest in this climate?

A climate where the best personal "return" is to be found in the weapon systems indirectly aimed at our own country's foot?

A foolish Middle Class and it's future options are soon parted ... when the best "investment" metrics have been arranged to be an investment in their own, guaranteed demise?

In a world where dynamic assets always outweigh static assets - by far - how is one supposed by benefit by investing primarily in static assets?



1 comment:

  1. ps: most investment advisors LOVE Lockheed Martin's "fundamentals"

    see

    http://elpdefensenews.blogspot.com/p/f-35-reading-list.html

    and

    http://chuckspinney.blogspot.com/2013/03/more-on-f-35s-concurrency-shop-of.html

    ReplyDelete