At its core, the Republicans' scorched-earth opposition to Obamacare has never been so much about "freedom" or "limited government" or any other right-wing ideological buzzword as it has been about political power, pure and simple. Now as for the past 20 years, Republicans have feared not that health care reform would fail the American people, but that it would succeed. Along with Social Security and Medicare, successful health care reform would provide the third and final pillar of Americans' social safety net, all brought you by the Democratic Party. To put it another way, the GOP was never really concerned about a "government takeover of health care", "rationing", "the doctor-patient relationship" or mythical "death panels," but that an American public grateful for access to health care could provide Democrats with an enduring majority for years to come.
But what Utah Senator Orrin Hatch called a "holy war" to block health care reform didn't start when Barack Obama took the oath of office in January 2009, but instead when Bill Clinton was inaugurated in 1993. It was then that former Quayle chief of staff and Republican strategist William Kristol warned his GOP allies that a Clinton victory on health care could guarantee Democratic majorities for the foreseeable future. "The Clinton proposal is also a serious political threat to the Republican Party," Kristol wrote in his infamous December 3, 1993 memo titled "Defeating President Clinton's Health Care Proposal," adding:
"Its passage in the short run will do nothing to hurt (and everything to help) Democratic electoral prospects in 1996. But the long-term political effects of a successful Clinton health care bill will be even worse--much worse. It will relegitimize middle-class dependence for 'security' on government spending and regulation. It will revive the reputation of the party that spends and regulates, the Democrats, as the generous protector of middle-class interests. And it will at the same time strike a punishing blow against Republican claims to defend the middle class by restraining government."
And that, for Kristol, meant it had to be stopped at all costs:PERRspectives
"The first step in that process must be the unqualified political defeat of the Clinton health care proposal. Its rejection by Congress and the public would be a monumental setback for the president; and an incontestable piece of evidence that Democratic welfare-state liberalism remains firmly in retreat."
The Real Reason for the GOP's All-Out War on Obamacare
John Perr
The market state versus the welfare state.
In this endeavor, the right worked very diligently to recast the framing so that welfare state would be perceived as living on the dole instead of its original meaning of public purpose being oriented toward the "general welfare," in the words of the Preamble to the US Constitution. Even if you were not taken in by the framing, many people have been.
The strategy in this endeavor was to use wedge issues and inter-group conflict to dupe the rubes into voting against their economic and social interests by creating a tribal mindset of "us versus those people." They even frame it in terms of "the real Americans" versus those people who aren't real Americans.
'Death panels' are not a myth.... Top Democrat fixer Rattner wrote an op ed in the top Democrat newspaper NYT iirc titled 'We Need Death Panels' and he is NOT kidding.... He is on the 'Fix the Debt' panel and these people I have no doubt would see people die due to treatment withheld because they think we are 'out of money'....
ReplyDeleteThese morons I have no doubt will kill us if given the chance...
I think the real reason that Republicans attack Obamacare so much is that Obama treads on their territory. He has tried to be more conservative than conservatives and forced them to take crazy positions. He is Bill Clinton all over again. Every day there are articles in the financial press about the lengths the O-administration is willing to go to, including lying, to protect and help their financial backers. What else do the Repubs have to offer other than dismantling the entire liberal set of laws on the books. There is no one out there willing to defend anything liberal.
ReplyDeleteBeg to differ Ryan.
ReplyDeleteWe have liberal application of conservative agendas! :(
Affordable Health Care is not ready for prime time.
ReplyDeleteSpecial favors and dispensations for everyone on the preferred list....
First, there was the delay of Obamacare’s Medicare cuts until after the election.
Then, big business (not small business) gets to delay ACA employer mandate.
Next, big unions get exceptions on ACA provisions to scale back “Cadallac” insurance plans that unions have fought for over the years.
Potential for Congressional staffers losing the subsidies raised concerns of “brain drain” from Capital Hill if staffers left as a result of the increased costs. Turns out that Congress & their staffers will not lose their health-care subsidies from the government after all when Obamacare is implemented because of a recent exception proposed by the Office of Personnel Management owing to President Obama getting personally involved in the negotiations.
Now.... one year delay of out-of-pocket insurance costs for ACA will make it a more expensive proposition for taxpayers and patients.
Reminds me of the famous line from George Orwell’s book Animal Farm “All animals are equal but some are more equal than others” as lead pig Napoleon said in a toast at a dinner party for the other pigs and local farmers, with whom he was celebrating a new alliance.