Pages

Pages

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Michael Ricciardi — Swedish Engineers Invent ‘Nano Gas’ That ‘Instantly Neutralizes’ Carbon Pollution (via Planetsave)

Swedish Engineers Invent ‘Nano Gas’ That ‘Instantly Neutralizes’ Carbon Pollution (via Planetsave)
The old saying “fighting fire with fire” may be true or not depending upon the situation, but if someone told you the best way to fight (carbon-based) gas is with another gas, you might raise a skeptical eyebrow or two. But that’s exactly what…


7 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's nothing. Financial crooks have bribed the brightest engineers, mathematicians and engineers worldwide to help them loot the Middle Class - every which way from Sunday!

    tools (Demand Leakages)

    tactics (swampin us w deranged marketing)

    strategy (political ops running circles around sane currency ops)

    policy (diverted)

    goals (derailed)

    desired outcomes (hijacking ours, to theirs)

    If we don't coordinate responses everywhere, we may as well not bother anywhere.

    ps: the best defense is a good offense?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Snowden fought the battle of NSA, NSA, NSA

    Snowden fought the battle of NSA,
    and the firewalls came tumbling down

    Blow your whistle, Snowden!

    Others too
    http://govwhistleblower.wordpress.com/

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is not a carbon sequestration process. Cleaning up combustion does not eliminate CO2. Those pesky carbon atoms have to go somewhere, and if you don't want them to end up released as a gas, they have to be 'captured' in some fashion.

    CH4 + 2O2 = 2H2O + CO2

    The above reaction for methane can be extended to other hydrocarbon molecules. You can even use sugar.
    In real life there are impurities in the fuel and nitrogen alongside oxygen.

    ReplyDelete
  6. True, Bob;
    it seems to oxidizes supposedly more potent carbon chains to supposedly less potent CO2

    doesn't sequester carbon,

    instead, it alters the spectrum of carbon-chain lengths

    sort of like QE for greenhouse gases? :(

    ReplyDelete
  7. Combined with putting carbon back into the soil of grasslands, it should be an effective tool. See:

    Tony Lovell
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wgmssrVInP0

    And Ichsani Wheeler
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhSggAFw7TU

    ReplyDelete