Pages

Pages

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Geoff Davies — More effective remedies for inequality than Piketty’s

I have read only reviews of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century, but clearly it is valuable for documenting the nature and history of inequality over the past century or three, and for highlighting the excessive political power that flows from super-wealth. Yet he frames it in terms of capital and capitalism and, for all the quality of his diagnosis, his main prescription evidently is just to tax the wealthy, through income and inheritance taxes.
The trouble is, capital and capitalism are very ill-defined. To speak of capitalism is to invite an un-constructive shouting match. Capitalism has caused great harm to people and the world! Yes but capitalism is what has made us rich!
A more useful framing is that there have been, and can be, many ways to structure a market economy. When one looks into the mechanisms that have operated in market economies, one can readily identify mechanisms that pump wealth from the 99% to the 1%. One can then think of ways to stop or reverse these flows, so wealth flows more fairly to everyone involved in its generation. It will be much more effective to fix the problems at the source than just to apply traditional retro-active bandaids like taxes.
In my own book Sack the Economists, I identified seven fairly obvious such mechanisms. Below is an edited excerpt that summarises mechanisms identified in the course of the book’s analyses. (Dean Baker has also made lists, short and longer, which are a little more detailed and only partly overlapping with mine.)
Real-World Economics Review Blog
More effective remedies for inequality than Piketty’s
Geoff Davies

Sack the Economists is available for $4.99 at Amazon Kindle.

1 comment:

  1. surely this topic is better labeled "ways to maintain resiliency"

    The DoD, for example, doesn't get tied in knots discussing "redistribution" of weapons from Generals to enlisted soldiers.

    Instead, they track "force-readiness" as the logical response, since all hang together, or they hang separately.

    How did some other professions lose track of such a simple concept? Ben Franklin used those same words when urging people to ratify the US Constitution.

    What happened?

    ReplyDelete