An economics, investment, trading and policy blog with a focus on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We seek the truth, avoid the mainstream and are virulently anti-neoliberalism.
Pages
▼
Pages
▼
Monday, July 20, 2015
Tatzhit — Radio Liberty: "UAF are shelling Donetsk in response to rebels shelling Donetsk"
Just let that headline sink in. Here is the actual language: “The ATO* spokesmen [Major General Taran and colonel Sergei Galushko] have presented proof that Donetsk is being shelled by the rebels themselves, in order to provoke return fire from the UAF forces, and then blame them for shelling Donetsk.”
So, here is the reality as presented by "Voice of Langley" in East Europe:
The rebels start randomly shelling their own families in Donetsk. UAF see it, get “provoked” by somebody else doing their job, and start indiscriminately shelling Donetsk as well.
Too broad a question to answer, since there are different degrees on the range of possibilities.
Generally speaking, I'd prefer a libertarian environment over an authoritarian on one, since there is a possibility of carving out a niche. But in an extreme right wing libertarian environment, a few people could end up owning everything with everyone else being dependent on them. The choice would be either starve to death or "voluntarily" become a slave to survive.
Hey Tom, unrelated but if you could live under left wing authoritarian regime or right-wing libertarian govt which would it be?
ReplyDeleteToo broad a question to answer, since there are different degrees on the range of possibilities.
ReplyDeleteGenerally speaking, I'd prefer a libertarian environment over an authoritarian on one, since there is a possibility of carving out a niche. But in an extreme right wing libertarian environment, a few people could end up owning everything with everyone else being dependent on them. The choice would be either starve to death or "voluntarily" become a slave to survive.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete