Pages

Pages

Monday, January 22, 2018

RUeconomics — Germans tell NATO that a war with Russia is "suicide" - they would know

The German Contra Magazin called on NATO to understand that a war against Russia is "suicide". Readers of the publication noted that Germany remembers this especially well....
In NATO, there are forces that are convinced of the correctness of a "military solution" of confrontation with Russia. However, anyone who attacks the Russians "actually commits suicide" because of the strength of Russian weapons and Moscow's readiness to use them in case of a threat to its security. An author of Contra Magazin, Ernst Planner, singles out the Iskander-M complexes, capable of "flying to Warsaw in two minutes, and four to Berlin."

In addition, NATO defense equipment is obsolete when it comes to the Iskanders, as they can fly in the mesosphere.
According to the journalist, NATO should have no doubts that the Russians, whose patriotism has increased against the backdrop of confrontation with the West, will "press the button" to defend their homeland.

In this case, the "madmen" who started the war, whether the US or the "nuclear dwarfs" Britain and France, will not stand a chance. Russia can destroy any external threat, and realist politicians (Planner places Trump and his associates among them) are well aware of this.
Some Germans getting concerned about trigger-happy Americans?

In trying to gain control over Russia, the US is more likely to loss control over Europe.

Fort Russ
Germans tell NATO that a war with Russia is "suicide" - they would know
RUeconomics - translated by Inessa Sinchougova

See also
The British Armed Forces are lagging behind the Russian army, as stated by the chief of the British General Staff, Nick Carter.
Carter stressed the seriousness of the threat, which, in his opinion, is represented by Russian cruise missiles successfully utilised in Syria. London does not have any protection from them, the head of the General Staff believes.
Won't result in a change in policy but rather increased military spending to fuel a new arms race.

Britain concerned about superiority of Russian Armed Forces
RIA - translated by Inessa Sinchougova

See also

Professor Robinson comments.
In a happy coincidence of timing, the head of the British Army (of which once, a long time ago, I was a member), General Sir Nick Carter, has provided us with a relevant case study to chew upon in our class. The BBC reports that in a speech tonight to the Royal United Services Institute, General Carter will argue that, ‘Britain’s armed forces risk falling behind Russia without more investment.’ According to the BBC, General Carter ‘will say the Army’s ability to respond to threats “will be eroded if we don’t keep up with our adversaries” … He will add that Russia is building an increasingly aggressive expeditionary force, which already boasts capabilities the British Army would struggle to match.’
And this is where Russia comes in useful. By exaggerating the Russian threat, the British army can make a claim to an increased share of the the country’s resources. The connection between the two – exaggerating threats and claiming resources – is quite explicit in this case.
We see here how the military industrial complex works. The army makes wild claims to justify its budget; the defence minister and his bureaucracy support the claims; institutions such as RUSI spread the word further among those who influence public opinion; and the press does its bit by giving space to the exaggerations. This isn’t a conspiracy – no doubt all these people believe in what they are doing. Long exposure to a given set of institutions tends to make people identify the national interest with those institutions’ interests. But the two aren’t the same. The British nation – that is to say its people – don’t benefit from conflictual relations with Russia; nor do they benefit from spending extra money on defence rather than on more productive activities (or alternative getting their money back in the form of tax cuts).
Irrussianality
The national interest?
Paul Robinson | Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa

also

Missed opportunity.
In the 1990s, American President George Bush Snr seriously considered the option of including Russia in the Strategic Defense Initiative (SOI) program, also known as 'Star Wars', as its partner. This is reported with reference to the newly declassified documents of the British government....
Declassified: How 1990s Russia almost became part of a US alliance
Vesti - translated by Inessa Sinchougova

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the 1990s, American President George Bush Snr seriously considered the option of including Russia in the Strategic Defense Initiative (SOI) program

    If he had done that, even with a Ross Perot challenge,he would have handily beaten Bill Clinton, and we would be in a different world today.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 'In trying to gain control over Russia, the US is more likely to lose control over Europe.'

    I hope so, we've had enough of US wars. Going around the world killing millions getting ' the bad guy'. Gee, those weapons cost $billions. A nice earner for someone.

    ReplyDelete