An economics, investment, trading and policy blog with a focus on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We seek the truth, avoid the mainstream and are virulently anti-neoliberalism.
Pages
▼
Pages
▼
Saturday, December 1, 2018
Caitlin Johnstone — Never, Ever Forget The Guardian/Politico Psyop Against WikiLeaks
Two more sources crossed off the list of links for me to cite here at MNE. Compromised.
The corporate media outlets get sloppier all the time with their lies. This Manafort-Wikipedia hoax really backfired on the Guardian. When they were caught, they claimed that “Russia-linked operatives” had fed them false information.
Sweet! :-)
If you believe the Russia-gate hoax, then the hoax is “true.”
If you do not believe the hoax, then it is still “true,” since you are a Russian agent.
“Former Guardian employee Jonathan Cook says the most likely explanation is that the editors permitted the article to be published because its anonymous sources came from within an intelligence or defense agency.”
No. Wrong. The Guardian fabricated this nonsense because the British and Ecuadorian governments are desperate for any pretext to boot Assange out of the embassy. The Manafort hoax was just the latest in a long string of Guardian hoaxes against Assange.
The Skripal hoax, the Assad gassing hoax, the WMD hoax, the Manafort hoax, the six million™ hoax, the “incubator babies” hoax, the Russia-gate hoax -- it never ends.
Most societies are built on a nexus of hoaxes that are protected by taboos, power structures, and the herd instinct.
The corporate media outlets get sloppier all the time with their lies. This Manafort-Wikipedia hoax really backfired on the Guardian. When they were caught, they claimed that “Russia-linked operatives” had fed them false information.
ReplyDeleteSweet! :-)
If you believe the Russia-gate hoax, then the hoax is “true.”
If you do not believe the hoax, then it is still “true,” since you are a Russian agent.
“Former Guardian employee Jonathan Cook says the most likely explanation is that the editors permitted the article to be published because its anonymous sources came from within an intelligence or defense agency.”
No. Wrong. The Guardian fabricated this nonsense because the British and Ecuadorian governments are desperate for any pretext to boot Assange out of the embassy. The Manafort hoax was just the latest in a long string of Guardian hoaxes against Assange.
The Skripal hoax, the Assad gassing hoax, the WMD hoax, the Manafort hoax, the six million™ hoax, the “incubator babies” hoax, the Russia-gate hoax -- it never ends.
Most societies are built on a nexus of hoaxes that are protected by taboos, power structures, and the herd instinct.