Beijing is able to court both Iran and Saudi Arabia at the same, something the U.S. is unable to do since American foreign policy is often dictated by human rights concerns.
So Iran, a theocratic democracy with a modicum of right is violating human rights, whereas Saudi Arabia, a hereditary hyper-authoritarian dictatorship aka theocratic monarchy that follows the interpretation of Wahhabism, which is the strictest and most anti-liberal form of Islam, is not violating human rights as the liberal West conceives this? What is this guy shooting up with?
Oil Price
China Sticks Up For Iran As Geopolitical Pressure Mounts
Tim Daiss
“Beijing is able to court both Iran and Saudi Arabia at the same, something the U.S. is unable to do since American foreign policy is often dictated by human rights concerns.”
ReplyDeleteThis sounds like a transcript of a stand-up comedian’s satire routine.
The article attacks Sudan which, like Eritrea and Venezuela, has deals with China, and refuses to submit to US neoliberal dictates.
Hence all the trash about Sudan’s and Venezuela’s “human rights violations.”
Note that in July 2011 the USA broke away the southern quarter of Sudan to form a new nation called South Sudan, and imposed English as the official language, and Salva Kiir Mayardit as puppet dictator. The USA is working on doing the same thing with the northeast third of Syria. Hence Trump has announced that their will be no Syria withdrawal after all.
Sudan considered resisting militarily, but decided not to, since the region was a basket case of endless civil war, and remains so today. Good riddance.