Pages

Pages

Thursday, June 6, 2019

CORE and Periphery in the Reform of Econ 101 — Peter Dorman


Peter Dorman critiques the CORE revision of Econ 101 and finds that it relies too much on rote and not enough on active learning. Rote may be more suitable for those going on in the study of economics, but most students taking Econ 101 don't. The introductory course should be designed to serve the needs of the many rather than the few.

Econospeak
CORE and Periphery in the Reform of Econ 101
Peter Dorman | Professor of Political Economy, The Evergreen State College

1 comment:

  1. Economics textbooks ― tombstones at the Flat-Earth-Cemetery
    Links on Peter Dorman on ‘CORE and Periphery in the Reform of Econ 101’

    “I often wonder whether other subjects suffer as much from textbook writers.” (Hahn, 1980)

    CORE: more lipstick on the dead economics pig
    https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2017/09/core-more-lipstick-on-dead-economics-pig.html

    To this day, economists have produced NOT ONE textbook that satisfies scientific standards
    https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2019/03/to-this-day-economists-have-produced.html

    Refuting MMT’s new Macroeconomics Textbook
    https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2019/03/refuting-mmts-new-macroeconomics.html

    Economists have no brain
    https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2016/10/economists-have-no-brains.html

    False on principle
    https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2015/08/false-on-principle.html

    Where economics went wrong (II)
    https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2018/10/where-economics-went-wrong.html

    The father of modern economics and his imbecile kids
    https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-father-of-modern-economics-and-his.html

    For details of the big picture see cross-references Econ 101/Old Curriculum/New Curriculum
    https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2015/11/cross-references-econ-101.html

    Egmont Kakarot-Handtke

    ReplyDelete