Interestingly, both Paul Krugman and Greg Mankiw, who come from different ideological perspectives (left and right respectively), but share much of the conventional paradigm (New Keynesianism), have difficulty coming to grips with what MMT economists are saying, apparently because they are trying to view it in terms of their own approach and conceptual frame instead of the very different MMT approach and framing.
This demonstrates the value of a pluralist and historical approach to the study of economics in learning to appreciate different perspectives and approaches on their own terms before critiquing them on the basis of one's own position. To do otherwise is an elementary mistake.
Bill Mitchell – billy blog
A response to Greg Mankiw – Part 3
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
A response to Greg Mankiw – Part 3
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
"This demonstrates the value of a pluralist and historical approach to the study of economics"
ReplyDeleteWhere do you think "New Keynesian" comes from? Mars?