Pages

Pages

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

Bill Mitchell — Forget the record deficits and public debt – focus on what the net spending is doing to advance well-being

Yesterday (October 21, 2020), the British Office of National Statistics (ONS) released the latest – Public sector finances, UK: September 2020 – which, predictably tells us that government borrowing was “£28.4 billion more than in September 2019 and the third-highest borrowing in any month since records began in 1993” and that the public debt ratio has risen to “103.5% of … GDP … this was the highest debt to GDP ratio since … 1960.” Shock horror. While I yawn. The financial media went to town on the data. The Financial Times article (October 22, 2020) – UK government borrowing reaches record in first half of fiscal year – claimed the second wave that is now sweeping the northern hemisphere “have dampened hopes” that the stimulus “could be quickly scaled back” which has “fuelled concerns over the US’s mounting public debt”. It didn’t clarify as to who was concerned or why. The old canards seem to die slowly. Meanwhile, the IMF has changed tack somewhat after its tawdry display during the GFC. Overall, we should be relaxed about the records being set (deficits, public debt) and focus on what the net spending is doing to advance our interests. Focusing on the financial parameters will just divert our attention away from what is important....
Bill Mitchell – billy blog
Forget the record deficits and public debt – focus on what the net spending is doing to advance well-being
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia

2 comments:

  1. “ Exactly what might “preserving the public purse” mean?”

    Yo its figurative Language... a figure of speech... it’s a rampant occurrence when using the dialogic methodology... you see it all the time...

    Maybe take a course in language...

    Then when they don’t know what it means literally they have to reify it and they end up thinking it’s real... they do this all the time.,,

    It’s a well known cognitive deficiency or error...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(Marxism)

    Science methodology doesn’t do this.,,







    ReplyDelete
  2. I would define “net spending “ in Cash Basis as Total Withdrawals minus Treasury security redemptions...

    ReplyDelete