I guess if mainstream economists use Milton Friedmanesque smears they think that will be sufficent to discredit Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). There have been a few critiques in the financial media recently along those lines. The authors tell there readers that they get the impression that MMT is just about a free lunch. Throw in Zimbabwe or Weimar are few times during the article and there you have it rather tawdry attempts at maintaining mainstream thinking when the world has entered a new era of fiscal dominance as policy makers discard their reliance on monetary policy to stabilise economies. This policy shift is diametric to what mainstream macroeconomists have been advocating for decades as they repeatedly warned that high deficits and public debt levels and large-scale central bank bond purchases would lead to disaster. However, their predictions have been dramatically wrong and provide no meaningful guidance to available fiscal space nor the consequences of these policy extremes for interest rates and inflation. The world is leaving them behind and it is interesting to see how they are trying to reposition themselves....
Bill Mitchell – billy blog
There is no such thing as a free lunchBill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Bill Mitchell, near the start of that article, refers to a tweet by Olivier Blanchard where OB says that Summers, OB, Rogoff etc have come up with a new “fiscal paridigm”. Only trouble is that you have to listen to a TWO HOUR Youtube presentation to find out what his amazing new “fiscal paridigm” is. Frankly I can think of better uses for my time
ReplyDeleteIf they’d produced an article of about the same length as an average newspaper article, i.e. about 800 words, I’d certainly have spent two minutes skimming thru it, and then devoted another ten minutes to going thru it more thoroughly if it looked interesting.
But TWO HOURS..????????
“ and large-scale central bank bond purchases would lead to disaster. ”
ReplyDeletelol they always do lead to disaster...