So the IMF has come late to the transitory inflation party. What was obvious months ago is now at the forefront of IMF forecasts. Better late than never I suppose. It is becoming clear that most indicators are still not predicting a major demand-side collapse in most nations. Growth has moderated slightly and the forward indicators are looking up. At the same time, the inflation data around the world is suggesting the price pressures have peaked and lower inflation rates are expected. Real wages continue to fall, which means that the inflationary pressures were not being driven by wages. So no wage-price spiral mechanism at play. And PMI data and related indicators (such as shipping costs, etc) suggest the supply constraints which drove the inflationary pressures are easing. So has all this been the work of the interest rate rises imposed on nations by central bankers (bar Japan)? Not likely. The rising interest rates and falling inflation are coincidental rather than causal. Which means the damage to low income debt holders and the bank profits boom from the higher rates was for what?...
Bill Mitchell – billy blog
Inflation has peaked, the supply side is recovering, and the interest rate rises were for what?
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
“ interest rate rises were for what? ”
ReplyDeleteBecause Brandon told them to do it to get rid of his “inflation” political problem…
After Brandon claimed it was transitory... which Bill says was the correct call.
ReplyDeleteBrandon never said it was transitory..
ReplyDeleteGoogle 'Biden inflation transitory'.
ReplyDeleteAre you getting old...?