Wednesday, June 10, 2009

My email to Warren Mosler, detailing my macro outlook


The good news is the deficit has already boosted non-governmentals savings to a record, $620 billion and that is only likely to grow larger by the time their spending reductions turn that trend. And of course, I = S, so we're in good shape for now.

Your original advice to me, when we had dinner in New York was, "Buy S&P futures and go play golf for a year." That was probably correct. I followed it. (Unfortunately, not in the size that I would have liked because of limited funds, but better than nothing. And, oh yeah, I am not a golfer, so I'm doing other things to keep me from watching stocks!)

Where I think you are wrong is China. I see China as having no choice in the matter. Even if they secretly desire to sustain exports they will have to relinquish this policy because it clashes with U.S. goals that now appear to be set in stone. It is becoming increasingly clear that the U.S. will not support a long-term commitment to sustaining output and employment if it means enlarging the "twin deficits." Moreover, policymakers on both sides of the aisle here in the States are terrified of the (inapplicable) fear that China will not keep buying our debt. They are also terrified of (clueless) rating agencies downgrading our AAA credit rating.

As such, there is a major long-term shift underway as I see it, where the U.S. comes to rely more heavily on an export-driven, "fiscally responsible" course that, by design, keeps income down and comparative advantage up (via a weaker currency vis-a-vis the renminbi at least). The Chinese will see a gradual, yet sustained erosion in exports to the America and, therefore, will be forced to rely on greater levels of domestic investment to support demand and employment whether they like it or now.

We are, in essence, handing them the mantle of global economic leadership because of our out-of-paradigm and destructive belief system. This is terrible for the citizens of this country and de-facto passes along to future generations of this nation a lower standard of living. But smart investors can "hedge" by investing in China now. China is where the U.S. was at the end of WWII, which means that fortunes will be made by those who buy and hold in what will be, as Boone Pickens likes to say, "the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the world." (But he says it for the wrong reason!)

Other than that, everything's hunky dory!



googleheim said...

Norman : I think you are right.

The Chinese deliberate underpegging of their currency is the opposite of what Argentina did to itself which was pegging their peso 1 : 1 to the USD. They exploded in debt default in 11/2001 and to add to this as is the case here DEREGULATION IN THE 1990's by the likes of Menem / Bush / Greenspan paradigm they sold all their utilies ( gas, water, electricity ) to like France and Spain who then destroyed the Argentine middle class, quality of life, and economy in general.

The Chinese underpegging of their Remnibi Yuan whatever is an economic threat to the quality of life of the US citizen like it or not.

Luckily everyone ran TO the dollar last fall unlike what Roubini, Rogers, Schiff, and all those destructive Republican'ts.

Creative destruction is not the answer.

I wonder from an objective viewpoint if the "genius" Art Lauffer consulted Argentina's Menem ( a South American Republican't ) into their deregulation period which led up to their crisis.

Maybe not, I hope he didn't because he is the few bright ones out there.

Remember the Reagan tax cuts with deregulation led to the S & L crisis in the 80's.

mortgageangel said...

goog, you said
'Remember the Reagan tax cuts with deregulation led to the S & L crisis in the 80's.'
Huh? What do you mean? I've never heard that. Would someone please explain for me?

googleheim said...

Easy peasy :

Tax Reform Act of 1986 and it's relation to the Savings and Loan crisis of the 1980's which put tax payers on the hook - Even Neil Bush had a bank fail -

click here

cut and paste this link back together

If the Feds put things back together after the bailout of the S & L , then you have a case example where :

1. tax payers were not on the hook
2. government intervention work sucessfully
3. Norman's explanation of credits applied historically
4. deregulation bad new

mortgageangel said...

goog, why do you keep doing that? Be cool.

Dakuro said...

It's interesting because everyone wants money, but It's not a good idea to play with it, in generic viagra labs for example the owner it's always stressed because of the money, as a good chinese guy.