An economics, investment, trading and policy blog with a focus on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We seek the truth, avoid the mainstream and are virulently anti-neoliberalism.
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Russia does another round of its own, "Cash for Clunkers" because it was a huge success!
Russia understands that it's first "Cash for Clunkers" program was a huge success, boosting sales and production. So they're doing another!
What do we do here in America? NOTHING! We just criticize it for having been a failure, even though sales shot up 60% and industrial production jumped!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Remember the good ol' days when people who were against Keynesian spending were considered anti-jobs?
Why don't we just give every citizen over the age of 18 $10,000, no make that $20,000. Why confine it to cash for clunkers?
Red,
Your sarcasm is noted.
You could, but there is nothing to say that people would decide to save that money rather than spend it. You could also cut taxes to some very low level to allow people to keep more of their income, but you could end up having the same problem.
The number is not important, what's important is that full employment is achieved. Whatever number it takes to achieve that is the right number. And once full employment is hit, it should be maintained, whether that comes about via the private sector, a combination of public/private or the government completely.
Mike Norman, once again you're batting 1,000!!! I totally agree with you!
It doesn't matter whether the government or the private sector creates the jobs, as long as the jobs are created to achieve full employment.
The federal government doesn't give a damn about this country. If it did, it would spend the dollars necessary to end this economic tragedy!
They should also give $5000 tax credit to the DIY crowd to remove their gasoline engine and make the car entirely plug-in.
They should also give the Austrian school a big foot in the derriere.
The republican't crowd want to have us suffer with no stimulus based on the deficit terrorist paradigm. Emasculating budgets for the purpose of masking a false "strong dollar policy" which is against their real agenda of a weak dollar so that they can "export" more as if that is where all the real dough is.
Globalization is not new, there are only new players and veterans still in the game.
Exporting for export sake is not a policy it is a sham.
Joker:
Got some REAL jokers running policy!!
Goog,
Well said.
What is your take on plug-in hybrids? I am very high on them as a real game changer.
Resp,
Post a Comment