"I'm trying to keep this as simple as possible, so it's accessible to second-year economics undergraduates.
"Many theoretical papers I read are full of impenetrable (to me) thickets of math. So I reverse-engineer the model. I try to figure out what the underlying model must be in order for the paper's conclusions to make sense.
"Many Modern Monetary Theory posts I read are full of impenetrable (to me) thickets of words. So I have reverse-engineered the model (with the help of Steve Randy Waldman's blog post and Scott Fullwiler in comments on that post). I think I have figured out what the underlying model must be in order for MMT's conclusions to make sense.
"I don't think my model is a straw man. It is a stick-figure. A very simple caricature that shows only the bare bones, but is still recognisable."
2 comments:
Brad DeLong had a few comments on this - Is "Modern Monetary Theory" Modern or Monetary or a Theory?
Thanks, Rajiv. I'll promote this to a post.
Post a Comment