The President of the Russian Federation said that expanding business freedoms is the best answer to external challenges and limitations. He voiced this opinion appearing at the Week of Russian Business of the Russian Union of Entrepreneurs and Manufacturers.Who knew? Putin is a liberal. Of course, Putin didn't think this up himself. It was a decision taken in conjunction with the elite. Russia is serious about restructuring.
“Further expansion of business freedoms is the best answer to external sanctions and challenges. Therefore we will continue to establish the most favorable conditions for those who wish to invest in domestic industry and economy, in the development of technologies and modern-era jobs.”
The capital amnesty rules in Russia ought to correspond to all international legal demands, so as not to cause suspicion of money laundering, Putin said. “State and business ought to work as partners to overcome the current poor climate and to trust one another. Esteemed colleagues, we can overcome the poor unfavorable economic climate and to establish a stable trajectory of growth only through a state-business partnership, which of course is impossible without mutual trust. We need to have a shared understanding of the country’s strategic tasks and keep our mutual interests in mind.”
The President emphasized that capital amnesty rules ought to be consistent with the demands of Financial Action Task Force. “They should be absolutely legal and understandable from the point of view of international law, so that nobody should have any doubt that what’s happening in Russia in that respect is wholly in accordance with international law and practice, including from the perspective of not allowing the laundering of money obtained through illegal activities.”....
But freedom is not for the Russian mafia, too. The message is also to unruly oligarchs that they must fall in line with the prevailing rules. Free-wheeling "capitalism" is over. It's also a message to state-owned enterprises to get competitve. Putin is also talking to the bureaucracy (nomenklatura) and deep state (siloviki), saying that it is also about national security and great power status. There will be freedom but it must be coordinated and handled responsibly.
J.Hawk’s Comment: What does all of that mean? For starters, it means Russia is returning (or maybe has returned) not to Five-Year Plans of the Stalin era which, while extremely effective at industrializing the country, also proved extremely difficult to manage, but to Lenin’s “Commanding Heights” model of the economy that was the norm during Lenin's New Economic Policy of the 1920s and which is the norm in today's China, in which the State retains close control over certain strategic branches of the economy (usually through the control of enterprises deemed to be “system-forming” and through state monopolies), while allowing other sectors of the economy to operate under free market principles. This approach is evident in Russia’s import substitution strategy—targeted support for the system-forming enterprises, and maximum liberalization to allow the opportunities created by sanctions and the ruble devaluation to be exploited by private entrepreneurs more swiftly and efficiently than a Five-Year-Plan would.
This duality of approach is also reflected in the composition of the Russian government, with the “statists” clearly predominating, but the “liberals” (which include Siluanov and possibly even Medvedev) playing and indispensable supporting role. Ultimately Russia needs both of these segments of the elite for its economy to function well—the over-dominance by either of the two is liable to cause economic problems, as Russia’s experience of the 1980s and the 1990s has shown.
EuroINF
Translated from Russian by J.Hawk
Original in Russian, Putin: The best answer to sanctions is increasing business freedoms
Translated from Russian by J.Hawk
Original in Russian, Putin: The best answer to sanctions is increasing business freedoms
4 comments:
This sounds like a line right out of the Tea Party wing of the House GOP. "We need to cut regulations to boost the economy."
Unreal. Who's working with this guy? John Boehner?
Nothing in there about growing incomes, investing in infrastructure, health care, medicine, modernization, scientific research. In other words, the best answer to sanctions is massive government led domestic investment.
What an idiot.
Mike its like they are all concerned about "competitiveness" everywhere you look...
They seemingly all want to reduce their real terms of trade for their own nations... this seems to be the main priority globally right now with tptb...
Will have forex implications imo...
rsp,
Dear Oligarchs,
Give us Putin's head on a platter and we'll cut you a better deal.
Bob, that's the US strategy in a nutshell. Same in Venezuela. Sanctions are aimed at the elites so that they will "see the light" and cooperate with the US as vassals in neoliberal globalization, for which they will be well compensated with booty.
Post a Comment