Wednesday, November 2, 2022

Bank Liquidity Management Introduction — Brian Romanchuk

 Important for understanding some of the details of MMT. MMT is not about just government finance but the operations of the monetary system in general (general case) and in specific jurisdictions (special cases). Thus, the banking system and how it interfaces with the government needs to be understood from the institutional POV.

For modern financial systems, the key distinguishing characteristic of banks is that they key managers of the liquidity of the system. Although one can find small banks (or community banks) that operate on more traditional lines, banking firms are diversified and operate in the capital markets as well taking in deposits and making loans in the manner described in most banking primers. What differentiates banks from other financial firms is that they are in the business of selling liquidity via credit lines. In order to credibly offer that service, the banks themselves have to been seen as being unquestionably liquid.

Although central bank lender-of-last-resort facilities offer the ultimate backstop of banking system liquidity, the reality is that everyone involved views such operations represent a failure on the part of the banks — they will only exist further at the whims of the government. The role of regulators and risk managers at banks is to avoid that outcome. In this article, I discuss how the system is supposed to work.…
When banks provide liquidity they are essentially "creating money" owing to their special relationship with the central bank as the currency issuer through their access to the payments system in return for submitting to regulation and oversight. 

So it becomes necessary to understand central banking, commercial banking, and the institutional relationship of the two. This is the basis of MMT's operational description component. See MMT economist Eric Tymoigne's book on money & banking here.

Bond Economics
Bank Liquidity Management Introduction
Brian Romanchuk

4 comments:

Matt Franko said...

If you use the word “liquidity “ you are doing Monetarism..,,

Matt Franko said...

“ When banks provide liquidity they are essentially "creating money" ..”

You are trying to explain the one figure of speech “creating money” with ANOTHER figure of speech “liquidity “ and that doesn’t work…

All you are doing is substituting the one figure of speech for another and nobody is learning anything…

Matt Franko said...

And btw RRR is zero:

https://mikenormaneconomics.blogspot.com/2020/03/fed-lowers-rrr-to-0.html

Whole article is unnecessary….

CounterEconomist said...

"Liquidity" is not a figure of speech.

For example, the "Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools" standard that is part of the Basel Accords (and was turned into local regulation in many countries) defines that Liquidity or High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) consists of unencumbered cash or assets that can be converted into cash at little or no loss of value in private markets.