Thursday, March 20, 2025

The Effects of Modern Monetary Theory on the Structure of Production — Patrick Newman

 For the record. From an Austrian economist.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the debt monetization proposals of Modern Monetary Theory from an Austrian structure of production perspective. It shows that this policy raises societal time preferences and reduces the number of higher order stages in the economy, leading to a higher interest rate, lower economic growth, and increased prices of consumer goods. In order to demonstrate this, it goes back to the basics and investigates the nature of government spending and how it differs from investment. I argue that Murray Rothbard, a staunch critic of Keynesian economics who would have also fiercely opposed MMT had he lived to see its rise, was correct to classify government expenditures as unproductive consumption that detract from genuine marketplace economic output. I then defend Rothbard’s position by explaining the very serious concerns some economists had in the 1930s and 1940s regarding how to measure government’s contribution to aggregate production statistics. Armed with a proper understanding of government’s antithetical nature to investment, the chapter is then able to explain why MMT’s proposal to expand the money supply to finance government spending shortens the production structure.
"I argue that Murray Rothbard, a staunch critic of Keynesian economics who would have also fiercely opposed MMT had he lived to see its rise, was correct to classify government expenditures as unproductive consumption that detract from genuine marketplace economic output."

This is a huge assumption that Keynesians of all types, many if not most institutionalists and Marxists and neo-Marxists would reject. Some neoclassical economists would agree with this assumption although perhaps in a weaker form. 

This assumption is pertinent at present since it lies at the foundation of DOGE and seems to reflect Elon Musk's monetarist thinking about economics and finance. 

Libertarians would of course agree with the assumption that government expenditure is unproductive and that they should be cut in favor of lower taxes. This is assumption correlates with the assumption that there are no public goods, only private goods.

The market-based state is also foundational for neoliberalism.


SSRN
The Effects of Modern Monetary Theory on the Structure of Production
Patrick Newman, Assistant Teaching Professor of Economics, University of Tampa

5 comments:

NeilW said...

Once again the issue is missed here. MMT says nothing about the size of government and whether government output is 'productive'. What it says is that there are credit balances held regardless of interest rate, and if those are not offset there will be constant recessions because there will be insufficient flow. That stop/start process and the damage it does is entirely evidence in the housing production system.

Adam Eran said...

First, see this: https://www.ted.com/talks/mariana_mazzucato_government_investor_risk_taker_innovator?language=en

One factoid of interest: 80% of the iPhone's "innovative" features come from government-funded research. This includes transistors (yes, Bell labs discovered them, but government funded the research), integrated circuits, the internet, GPS, etc.

As much as the "useful idiots" try to ignore it, China has taken note, and is pulling into the technology lead now because their government doesn't privatize everything.

Matt Franko said...

Saw someone mention “proof of work money” the other day .. like Bitcoin etc

Matt Franko said...

“ What it says is that there are credit balances held regardless of interest rate”

MMT doesn’t say that… YOU say that…

It’s a scientific statement… “credit balances” is technical terminology from accounting science…

Matt Franko said...

MMT is not either accounting science or applied regulatory mathematics…