Showing posts with label Weimar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Weimar. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

ModernMonetaryTheorist — Implications Of Trump's Statement 'U.S. Can Print Money'

Summary
  • Presumptive Republican Nominee Trump has set off a firestorm economic debate declaring "United States government. First of all, you never have to default because you can print the money.".
  • Trump introduces the key tenant of Modern Monetary Theory into the economic debate. The key part theorizes sovereign nations that borrow in own currency should spend to boost their economy.
  • As this debate widens, it will spill into the gold markets as some people falsely fear the U.S. may kick off a bout of hyper-inflation if Trump wins the Presidency.
Seeking Alpha
Implications Of Trump's Statement 'U.S. Can Print Money'
ModernMonetaryTheorist

Friday, August 15, 2014

Lord Keynes — Liquidationism and early 1930s Germany: Not a Good Mix!


Eye-opener. It was not the Weimar hyperinflation that brought Hitler and the Nazis to power but deflationary depression.
By 1928, during the economic boom in Germany, the Nazi party vote looked like it was almost dead and was only 2.6%. Remarkably, even in the aftermath of the Weimar hyperinflation in 1924 it was only 3%. 
When the deflationary depression struck Germany from 1929–1932, it soared to 18.3% (September 1930), then 37.3% (July 1932), and finally to 43.9% in March 1933 in the aftermath of the Great Depression.
Social Democracy For The 21St Century: A Post Keynesian Perspective
Liquidationism and early 1930s Germany: Not a Good Mix!
Lord Keynes

Ominously, deflationary depression threatens Europe again owing to austerity and the persistent German anti-inflation fetish. Some lessons are never learned.

See also Yves Smith,  Is the West Risking Financial Blowback From Sanctions on Russia? at Naked Capitalism.

Matt O'Brien,  Europe’s Greater Depression is worse than the 1930s at the Washington Post.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Nathan Tankus: Germany, the “German View” of Hyperinflation and the Ghettoization of Dissent

Money is a social construct. It also facilitates many complex, interrelated social relations. As a result, it’s difficult to pin down for the average person what the effects of a particular policy will be, especially with regard to economic policy. While inflation may have negative effects in certain times or places, it’s difficult to figure that out just by looking around a city or country. As a result when politicians or other figures with agendas want to talk about inflation, they inevitably go for the most visceral descriptions available. For some number of decades now, the example they go to do decry inflation is people carrying around “wheelbarrows full of money” to go buy something such as bread. One of their favorite examples is Weimar Germany. So let’s talk about it.
Naked Capitalism
Nathan Tankus: Germany, the “German View” of Hyperinflation and the Ghettoization of Dissent

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Joseph Laliberté — Hyperinflation in Weimar Germany

The objective of this analysis is to demonstrate using a post-Keynesian flow of funds analytical framework that, in conformity with the “Germany view”, the terms of reparations included in the Treaty of Versailles set the conditions for hyperinflation in Weimar Germany. Also, it seeks to show that hyperinflation in Weimar Germany is fully consistent with the existence of significant and on-going imbalances in both the current account and the fiscal situation.
Fictional Reserve Banking
Hyperinflation in Weimar Germany: New Perspective on the “German View” using a Post-Keynesian Flow of Funds Framework
Joseph Laliberté
Some of this material will be used for a future publication. Comments most welcome.

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Michael Hudson — Financial Predators v. Labor, Industry and Democracy


Another searing indictment, delivered here in a speech in Germany about the failure of the EZ due to financialization. Long, but worth read all the way through.
A political and ideological coup d’état is replacing democracy with financial oligarchy, transferring government power to banks and bondholders. The new policy is not for governments to tax the wealthy but to borrow from them – at interest, which is to be paid by taxing labor, consumers and industry all the more. To proceed down this path would reverse Europe’s Enlightenment and the past three centuries of economics. It is called classical economics – and even “free market economics” – but it is a travesty to impose this policy in the name of the patron saints of classical political economy. The Physiocrats, Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, Wilhelm Roscher, Friedrich List and Progressive Era reformers urged just the opposite path of what now is being taken, and indeed which the world seemed to be following until World War I and for a few decades after World War II.

The euro was crippled at the outset, financially and fiscally

The European Union was created largely as a project to end war, but the way the Eurozone has been shaped has opened an unanticipated form of warfare and tribute-seeking: a conquest waged by bankers and their major rentier clients to create a financial oligarchy ruling via “technocrats” installed much as proconsuls used to serve in the Roman Empire. Acting on the prime directive that all debts must be paid, willy-nilly, this administrative class is willing to plunge economies into austerity and depression to create an opportunity to break the power of labor unions and roll back social spending under force majeure conditions. Reversing the past two centuries of European Enlightenment, financial interests are fighting to reverse the Progressive Era’s reforms of a century ago and the social democracy that followed World War II.
Europe is being pushed into depression, but it is not a cyclical business downturn or a result of natural phenomena. It is not economically necessary, and certainly not the result of labor being overpaid – except to the extent that it is paid more to cover its payments to the banks. The sovereign debt crisis is being used as an opportunity to force privatization sell-offs and dismantle the power of governments to regulate and tax wealth. Budget deficits are used not to revive employment, Keynesian-style, but to save banks and bondholders from having to take a loss.
Michael Hudson
Financial Predators v. Labor, Industry and Democracy

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Tim Taylor on hyperinflation


For the record. Some useful data on hyperinflations.

Read it at Conversable Economist
by Tim Taylor | Managing Editor, Journal of Economic Perspectives
(h/t Mark Thoma)

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Edward Harrison on Hyperinflation

Edward Harrison of Credit Writedowns has written insightfully about hyperinflation previously, integrating the MMT perspective with his Austrian school background. Here is Ed's latest, along with a video of his recent appearance with Max Keiser.