At least not soon enough to matter.
To adaptive aggregates, tempo always matters.
A rough semblance of an issue widely disseminated this week is always better than a perfect discourse delivered long after the fact .... to too few.
The following is from a Dec 1 book signing at the DC office of the American Federation of Teachers.
"In his 18 years as an opinion columnist for the New York Times, Bob Herbert championed the working poor and middle class. After filing his last column in 2011, he set off on a journey across the country to report on Americans who were being left behind in an economy that has never fully recovered from the Great Recession. The portraits of those he encountered fuel his new book,Losing Our Way. Herbert’s combination of heartrending reporting and keen political analysis is the purest expression since the Occupy movement of the plight of the 99%."
Less than 100 out of ~320 million residents of the USA attended. There was minimal (if any) press coverage in the local DC newspapers.
Herbert's conviction? "The truth will set us free." Yet he doesn't say when. Perhaps when the truth is adequately disseminated? To a threshold proportion of the electorate?
And if data is meaningless without context, don't we have to simultaneously disseminate adequately adaptive perceptions of our national context either simultaneously, or beforehand?
At the book signing, Herbert's book was available for purchase for $20.
If even 10% (32 million) of our residents received this book (which hasn't happened), that'd just transfer $640million from residents to the printers/publishers (including a tiny royalty to the author) - thereby feeding the very inequality they SAY that they want to erase. Might as well guarantee you'll never reach a goal, by triggering an infinite series of steps that also keep moving the target - like a clown kicking the hat he stoops to seize.
“Asked by a World War II veteran, ‘What happened to us?,’ Bob Herbert does what he has done all through his remarkable career as a journalist: He sets out to find the answers from the ground up. Searching out the stories and experiences of everyday Americans, and digging deep into facts and figures from ‘the high noon of capitalism’ to the widening gulf of our present vast inequalities, he takes us to the heart and core of our troubles while holding firmly to the conviction of his lifetime: that the truth shall set us free. Here is America as revealed by a great reporter whose empathy with everyday people inspires trust on their part, honesty on his and discovery for all who make the journey with him.” — BILL MOYERS, Former White House Press Secretary
“In a series of haunting portraits, Losing Our Way is an unforgettable reminder of the struggles facing America’s middle class today. Herbert has given us a sweeping picture of what has gone wrong in America—how we have underinvested in infrastructure, let corporate policies dominate the education debate and fought needless wars that resulted in a tragic waste of life. A brilliant and devastating portrayal that explains how our priorities and policies have gone awry, Losing Our Way will make you angry and determined to put our country back on course.” — JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, Winner of the 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics and Author of The Price of Inequality
At the book signing, Herbert's book was available for purchase for $20.
If even 10% (32 million) of our residents received this book (which hasn't happened), that'd just transfer $640million from residents to the printers/publishers (including a tiny royalty to the author) - thereby feeding the very inequality they SAY that they want to erase. Might as well guarantee you'll never reach a goal, by triggering an infinite series of steps that also keep moving the target - like a clown kicking the hat he stoops to seize.
This is a distributed task which our aggregate cannot win without changing it's methods, to regain free, mandatory education of ourselves, by ourselves.
If those involved really wanted to make a difference, don't THEY need to be aware of changing context too?
Wouldn't it be far better to distribute Herbert's book as a free pdf, to every citizen in the USA?
If those involved really wanted to make a difference, don't THEY need to be aware of changing context too?
Wouldn't it be far better to distribute Herbert's book as a free pdf, to every citizen in the USA?
There are more ways to lose our way every year, involving novel ways of losing track of both context and tempo.
Capitalism cannot operate separate from Statesmanship.
Selling controlled access to insights works for personal competition among system components. Adaptive suggestions not actively broadcast & disseminated for free do not progress to Aggregate Adaptive Rate.
There is no "I" (or capitalism) in teamwork, nor in policy, nor in statesmanship.
If we cannot keep personal capitalism operating within tolerance limits, then we cannot preserve and manage Aggregate Adaptive Rate.
Statesmanship requires awareness of Aggregate Capitalism as well as the sum of Personal Capitalism, and it also requires the brains to see that our Aggregate Survival tracks dynamic co-optimization of the sum of those two variables across changing contexts, not optimizing either in isolation, in given contexts.
Non-economist citizens used to learn such team concepts in the course of childhood, or at least in high school civics &/or calculus classes. What happened?
Render (to tolerance limits) unto hoarders all that serves personal gains & copyrights.
Statesmanship requires awareness of Aggregate Capitalism as well as the sum of Personal Capitalism, and it also requires the brains to see that our Aggregate Survival tracks dynamic co-optimization of the sum of those two variables across changing contexts, not optimizing either in isolation, in given contexts.
AS ~ Sum[ki(AC) + sum{Ij(PCi)}]
(i denotes transient contexts)
(k & j denote context specific, polynomial variables)
Render (to tolerance limits) unto hoarders all that serves personal gains & copyrights.
Render unto OpenSource, all that serves Statesmanship and Aggregate Adaptive Rate.
Put another way, if we can maintain separation of Church & State, why not separation of personal capitalism and Statesmanship? It's the only way we'll survive.
Letting civil servants & citizens be divided & conquered by sociopathic wealth hoarders isn't the answer. Just define their operational tolerance limits and let them live within them, like all components of an evolving system.
There is no path of aggregate survival that does not involve dynamically adapting equilibria between increasing numbers of conflicting forces. Deal with it. There is no point in any institution "winning" by killing it's teammates. That's an oxymoron of the most base sort, that only moronic NeoLiberals believe.
