Showing posts with label fica taxes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fica taxes. Show all posts

Friday, June 19, 2015

Social Security, FICA Taxes and CWICA Taxes

   (Commentary posted by Roger Erickson)



hat tip Dan Lynch

see also the Luther Gulick memo:

We supposedly NEED taxes to fund one policy, but not another?  Bullshit! Please stop and think, what does "fiat" even mean?


For all nations, a key goal is to dynamically "right-size" currency supply for changing population size and context. Part of that right-sizing involves managing inflation. End of story. Change in population and/or public activity patterns dictates changes in required currency supply.

This is 3rd grade logic.

Why on Earth don't politicians know this?  Simply because their corporate funding depends on them NOT knowing it? That sure seems like the only conclusion.

Meanwhile, yearly or long term changes in currency supply are incidental to yearly changes in population or Public Initiative, and as natural as changing your blood supply as you grow from infant to adult. Does the current generation of cells in your body have a "red-blood-cell" deficit that must be paid back to the succeeding generations of the cells produced and turning over during your lifetime? For both national currency supply & personal red-blood-cell supply, application of the word "deficit" is merely an unfortunate semantic trick that may sometimes snare the uninformed.


So either do away with FICA taxes completely, or impose CWICA Taxes to "fund" corporate welfare. Quit foisting outright lies on the US public. They deserve better, if you want a strong, dynamic nation.

Anything in between is just class warfare ... and failure "to make a more perfect union."


Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Sure, Tom Paine Predicted Social Security ... but He Did NOT Predict FICA Taxes

   (Commentary posted by Roger Erickson)

Agrarian Justice: With a new Foreword, "Social Security, Thomas Paine, and the Spirit of America"

The "new" forward is by our favorite NeoLiberal Harvard Lawyer, Nancy Altman.

How misleading is Nancy's outlook? It's more insidiously wrong than you could possibly believe. I shudder to imagine what choice words Tom Paine  - if resurrected - would have for NeoLiberals of today, such as Nancy Altman.

Sure, Tom Paine Predicted Social Security ... but He Did NOT Predict FICA Taxes.  Social Security, after all, was practiced by every known tribal society worldwide, for the past 100,000 years. (Hint, FICA taxes weren't invented until ~1936.)

The tragic part is that SS-Works & Nancy Altman TRULY BELIEVE (or SAY they believe) that it is ONLY FICA taxes that make SocSec possible - while that is the exact opposite of the simple truth. What Nancy Altman is spewing is misguided bullshit, of course.

Have YOU ever seen another public policy paid for by a pre-emptive tax on citizens? What? No "CWICA" tax to pay for Corporate Welfare? How about for Air Force bombers? Bank bailouts? You may as well quit looking. Only the working class is taxed this way, and for no good reason whatsoever.

To understand why, please read this historical link all the way to the end.

Then remind yourself that FIAT TAXES FOR FIAT REVENUE ARE OBSOLETE ... and have been ever since 1933.

If more citizens understood that 4 generations of US citizens have been held down ONLY for the exact purpose of holding them back ... there'd be blood in the streets tomorrow. You, your parents, your grandparents and your great grandparents have all been cheated like disenfranchised sharecroppers. There should be reparations for 80+ years of unnecessary FICA taxes.

It's a bitter pill to realize that your own country has a policy of purposefully over-taxing and under-funding the working classes.

And why? Pure stupidity and greed on the part of the "Upper" looting classes, and pure gullibility on the part of the working classes. Doesn't anyone in this country know what counts anymore?


Is it too late? Tens of millions of voters must look in their mirrors and ask themselves that question.

While you're at it, also ask whether you truly love your children, and/or all the future citizens of the USA. If you do (and aren't a moron) you'd cease - forever - urging fellow citizens to try to save public fiat instead of investing it. Conflating current fiat and future public options is suicidal for a growing population.

I have to ask Nancy Altman if she's ever asked herself the following question about our supposed deficit in fiat.


Decide for yourself. What happens when YOU run out of fiat? Does it help if you BALANCE your fiat? (Whatever THAT means.)

Thursday, November 21, 2013

"How Franklin D. Roosevelt Botched Social Security"

(Commentary by Roger Erickson)

The Paradigmatic Liberal as Fiscal Conservative

Fascinating read.

Will have to read this several times over to let it all soak in.

First comment, it's surprising that there's no mention of Luther Gulick's famous memo, admitting that FICA taxes were never a necessity, only enough politics to get the act passed against party-specific opposition.


Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Fighting Multiple Levels of Social Security Control Fraud


Every wage earner in the USA should feel very, very angry, and in fact, enraged, once they understand the depth & duration of the Big Lie behind Social Security and FICA taxes.

That anger, however, is something to both acknowledge, worry about, and productively manage. Don’t get angry, get even, by getting free. Reflect on the bitter fact that you, your family, your parents, and your grandparents never even needed to pay FICA taxes the last 70-some years. That will really cause some resentment.  Revolutions are always justified, but rebellions are always betrayed.  So please use your head and consider how to right this perpetuated wrong, not just be angry about it.  Let's go back to FDR's concluding statement some time after enactment of the Social Security pact.

 In the course of ... discussion [Luther Gulick] raised the question of the ultimate abandonment [of] the pay roll taxes in connection with old age security and unemployment relief in the event of another period of depression. 
   ...
  [Gulick] suggested that it had been a mistake to levy these taxes in the 1930’s when the social security program was originally adopted
   ...
FDR said, “I guess you’re right on the economics. They are politics all the way through. We put those pay roll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and their unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program. Those taxes aren’t a matter of economics, they’re straight politics.”


Please re-read that several times, and let it sink in for a moment.  Justice, fairness and logic were all sacrificed to politics, right from the start.  Like with many political processes, later remedies were pre-conceived, but never fulfilled.  In fact, the baked in wrongs only became more entrenched with time, through the filter of intense lobbying & propaganda.

I wonder how my grandparents stood for it at the time.

Someone tell Simpson & Bowles that we have millions of sub-contractors clamoring to suckle at the national "tit" they're so fond of alluding to, all in the name of serving the electorate they mindlessly want to suck initiative from in the form of fiat currency.  The core mission & policy given Congress in the US Constitution is to direct policies & public contracting so as to care for the welfare of the people.  Simpson & Bowles have it so squarely backwards that one is embarrassed for them, and for those whom they're misleading.

Jumping to the present, how would YOU tell 150 million salaried adults that their wages needn’t ever have BEEN taxed their entire, working life?

And furthermore, that they were taxed ONLY to keep one class of people over-taxed and under-funded relative to another class of people? Worse, that the same was true of the FICA taxes levied on their parents, AND their grandparents! Them’s fightin’ words!

There could and should be hell to pay for all that have contributed to that truly disgusting crime, through silence, fear or complicity. If that’s not treason of the highest order, then we may as well all emigrate to some country where honesty, courage, morality & national ambition still reign.

The scale of the Social Security fraud leaves one nauseous. It’s not what one wants to think of one’s own country.

To realize that there are whole foundations dedicated solely to maintaining a regressive tax on labor, only exacerbates the shame. For instance, staff at the supposed Social Security Works campaign still actively promote the self-deceiving myth that FDR desperately resorted to.  A main plank of SSW is that the regressive FICA taxes do not regressively tax labor, but actually protect the rights of working people to an adequate pension by providing them with a unique, tax-based citizen's right.   Whew!   Talk about Control Frauds perverting our own thinking, and then expecting us to thank them for the benefit of sharing unequally in national output!

Following adoption of a fully-fiat currency system in 1933, taxing labor cannot be accepted as the prerequisite for any public policy whatsoever.  If we can  - as simple policy - vote subsidies for highways, space exploration, worldwide military capabilities, corporate farming, and endless corporate supports - from agriculture to research - then we can also support our own elderly citizens as a simple policy.  Over-taxing working citizens throughout their productive years is an incomprehensible burden on national Output.   What were we thinking?   Why have we let this proceed so long?   Do we WANT the USA to be far, far less than it could be, not merely less?

For any person who perpetuates a fraud after being advised of operational reality, the fraud is no longer innocent. It is self-defeating for their own family, children & country. It is treason.

Innocent Fraud As a Business Model = saying regulation must NOT be n-dimensional … and succeeding with that propaganda.

We have burdened lower-income classes with huge penalties relative to the wealthy & frauds - since 1934 - by taxing the poor through FICA taxes, to pre-charge for the pittance an increasingly richer aggregate “may” give them “if” they live long enough.

That’s essentially just a way for one class or clan to over-tax & under-fund a perceived competitor class; instead of working together productively. It’s a tragic travesty, the bitterness of which should bring any thinking person to tears!

By doing this we’ve drastically curtailed the return-on-coordination that would have been possible the last 70+ years. Why are we working hard to be less, rather than more, than the sum of our parts?

Of course professional jargons and semantic diversity are problems, and of course public policy can’t be guided by accounting alone. Understanding the reserve-accounting underlying a fiat currency system is a necessary but not sufficient step in aggregate agility. So is recruiting people from the 2000 & growing NAICS fields so that they can openly discuss & explore our constantly growing options.   To realize even a pittance of our insanely great public options, we need to be acknowledging & using & fusing distinct jargons, and above all else COORDINATING graciously & gracefully!