Showing posts with label identification problem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label identification problem. Show all posts

Monday, December 26, 2016

John Muellbauer — Macroeconomics and consumption: Why central bank models failed and how to repair them


Good analysis of why central bank models fall short based on overly restrictive assumptions and failure to include key factors in the parameters. So the parameters that are identified are miscast and important parameters are ignored, notably the role of credit as a financial accelerator. 

vox.eu
Macroeconomics and consumption: Why central bank models failed and how to repair them
John Muellbauer | Senior Research Fellow, Nuffield College; Professor of Economics, Oxford University; and Senior Fellow, Institute for New Economic Thinking, Oxford Martin School

Monday, December 19, 2016

Sputnik International — Humiliating Billion User Hack Attack on Yahoo 'Likely Launched by a State Actor'


No evidence. Wild inference.

These people seem to have no idea of the issues surrounding identification of causal assumptions.

Conflation of a sufficient condition with a necessary condition.

Beyond lame.

Sputnik International
Humiliating Billion User Hack Attack on Yahoo 'Likely Launched by a State Actor'

Monday, September 19, 2016

David F. Ruccio — Phlogiston, the identification problem, and the state of macroeconomics

The problem is similar in macroeconomic models, and Romer finds that many mainstream economists rely on models that require and presume exogenous shocks—imaginary shocks, which “occur at just the right time and by just the right amount” (hence phlogiston)—to generate the desired results. Thus, in his view, “the real business cycle model explains recessions as exogenous decreases in phlogiston.”
The issue with phlogiston is that it can’t be directly measured. Nor, as it turns out, can many of the other effects invoked by mainstream economists. Here’s how Romer summarizes these imaginary effects/ A general type of phlogiston that increases the quantity of consumption goods produced by given inputs:
  • An “investment-specific” type of phlogiston that increases the quantity of capital goods produced by given inputs
  • A troll who makes random changes to the wages paid to all workers
  • A gremlin who makes random changes to the price of output
  • Aether, which increases the risk preference of investors
  • Caloric, which makes people want less leisure
So, there you have it: in Romer’s view, contemporary mainstream economists rely on various types of phlogiston, a troll, a gremlin, aether, and caloric. That’s how they attempt to solve the identification problem in their models.…
Occasional Links & Commentary
Phlogiston, the identification problem, and the state of macroeconomics
David F. Ruccio | Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame