Showing posts with label static assets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label static assets. Show all posts

Sunday, September 28, 2014

What Do We Call People Who Hoard Coordination Skills, Rather Than Merely Static Assets?

   (Commentary posted by Roger Erickson)

We're universally familiar with the concept of a billionaire.

It denotes hoarding of significant STATIC assets.

Yet it's obviously better to have DYNAMIC assets vs static assets. Evolution - and wars - have already proven that without a doubt.

So what would we call people who hoard coordination skills, rather than static assets?

Coordinairs?

How would we differentiate skill levels?
Community organizers? CoordiMillionairs? 
Regional organizers? CoordiBillionairs ? 
National organizers? CoordiTrillionairs?
Or just leaders?

Statespeople = ???

Yet in this context, what's the significance of another decimal point in a given metric, or another order of magnitude in whatever the assessment system is?

Do we focus on the size of the asset hoarded, or focus on the implications of the Desired Outcome?


Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Fighting over the "Last, great, unguarded pools of money in this country." Really?

(Commentary posted by Roger Erickson)

That's how the American Federation of Teachers & AFL-CIO think?

That's what they think "People Power" is? Could we set our sights a bit higher?

No wonder we're focusing on tactics, winning a few Pyrrhic victories, ignoring strategy & context, and losing the class war.

Sounds like this topic meets their Gold Standard. :(
From AFL-CIO <peoplepower@aflcio.org>:
Join AFT President, Randi Weingarten
& ex Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi
for a discussion of his new book
The Divide: American Injustice
in the Age of the Wealth Gap

Monday, April 21, 2014, 3–4:30 p.m.
AFT, 555 New Jersey Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20001, (4th Flr Conf Room)
RSVP to Carolyn Jenkins at cjenkins@aft.org byApril 18
Matt Taibbi has led the effort to expose Wall Street firms that are making millions in profits off public pension funds.

“Essentially it is a wealth transfer from teachers, cops and firemen to billionaire hedge funders,” Taibbi says. “Pension funds are one of the last great, unguarded piles of money in this country, and there are going to be all sorts of operators that are trying to get their hands on that money.” 
[As usual] Matt Taibbi's book, "The Divide" will be available for purchase and signing.
#####

This is amazing. And also deflating. 

Reminds me of the last, great, unguarded pool of ladders, and how people might use them to get a better view of context.


We're all supposed to focus on the "last, great, unguarded pools of money in this country?" Why? When all these static pools of already-expressed-fiat pale in comparison to continuous access to our own, unlimited public fiat

"Fiat" currency in the USA is a direct expression of public initiative (and has been, officially, since 1933, NOT just since the inter-gov-only adjustments of 1971). Once we're convinced that we can somehow run out of our own, unlimited public initiative, then perhaps we've passed a tipping point. Past that point, is every pool of static assets already divided and conquered? Is Taibbi only uselessly railing about the mop-up exercises, AFTER implied capitulation? And in the process, completely missing the far more important DYNAMIC ASSETS?

Someone please tell Matt & the AFL-CIO that capitulation has not yet occurred? And that dynamic assets always trump static assets?

And also tell them that over-emphasis on defending (to the death) the isolated pools of already-issued fiat currency credits is a strategic error of colossal proportions? Isn't that like hunkering down to defend Stalingrad, and forgetting the purpose of the whole class war? Hint to all. Success ALWAYS tracks ability to envision the expanding scale of context - i.e., "Battle Space" - and exploring new options with more agility than opponents.

Given that the "opponents" in this struggle represent only our own, distributed ignorance, this is a battle we should win with ease, if we'd only listen, sooner, to more of ourselves!

Taibbi's call is akin to ONLY fighting over pools of already-issued tax credits?

That's how losing sides illustrate that divide-&-conquer works.

Taibbi doesn't get it? Nor does the AFL-CIO? And, they're both missing the bigger point? Worse,by doing so they actually help divert our electorate's attention away from the far bigger crime proceeding under our very noses, unnoticed by nearly all?

Nothing is as defeatist as a victimized population going along with it's own robbery, while actually helping to distract their own, distributed attention to details which are subsidiary to the greater crime.

In an all or nothing struggle for operational democracy, you do NOT focus excessive attention on subsidiary details, to the detriment of grand strategy!!! What part of all-or-nothing don't these people understand?

Instead of getting tied in knots defending specific, completely optional beachheads, the US Middle Class needs to be on an ALL OUT OFFENSIVE to preserve functional democracy .... and ACTING WITH AGILITY!!!

If the AFL-CIO would only take this context more seriously, this pointless, class in-fighting could be over in 6 months .... or it could drag on, with tragic economic losses, for another generation.

Monday, August 19, 2013

Interesting Outside Review Of MICC. Implications For The Looming "Value" Of Lockheed Martin et al

Commentary by Roger Erickson

Something to be aware of, if you're interested in emerging strategic options, not just archaic ideology.

Air/Land/Sea strategy leaders all replaced w officers who game the system, get merit badges, retire & work 4 industry

How does a sane citizen invest in this climate?

A climate where the best personal "return" is to be found in the weapon systems indirectly aimed at our own country's foot?

A foolish Middle Class and it's future options are soon parted ... when the best "investment" metrics have been arranged to be an investment in their own, guaranteed demise?

In a world where dynamic assets always outweigh static assets - by far - how is one supposed by benefit by investing primarily in static assets?



Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Why, in this day & age, Can't ALL Citizens See the Utter Futility in Our Aggregate Policy?


“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money-power of the country will endeavor to prolong it’s reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”
..., (attributed to) USA President Abraham Lincoln, 1863

That was in a day when wealth was still mostly perceived as static assets to be hoarded.

Few saw the timeless & complete dominance of dynamic value over supposed static value.

Today, people have explicitly written for decades about cost-of-coordination being the highest cost, and the implicitly obvious corollary, that return-on-coordination is the highest return.

Aka, teamwork easily trumps any amount of individual hoarding. Well Duh!

Given that coordination cannot be hoarded by individuals, only by aggregates, why on earth is our electorate so stubbornly ignorant about the ramifications of this simple conclusion? Why do we keep training & rewarding individuals to hoard negligible commodity value, while doing so inadvertently starves their aggregate of the insanely great return on coordination?  Our best & brightest know the present course won't work, and say so.

"Success follows the quality [& tempo] of distributed decision-making"

"We generate tempo by decentralizing decision-making"

So why don't we just teach that in Kindergarten?

It's one thing to be ignorant. To wilfully insist on remaining ignorant defines stupidity.

American's didn't use to be this stupid. Recognizing the obvious is taking too long. Have we quit looking?

Given our population density, we're in the process of a permanent transition from dominance of personal hoarding of assets, to aggregate hoarding of coordination capabilities.  That's always been true, since the dawn of life on this planet.  Yet it's 2012, and most of our population does not adequately grasp this simple truth.

In fact, our population is mostly still mystified by dynamic semantics, and the concurrent manifestations of density.  A confluence of densities is not funny.