Greg Smith, Goldman's global head of equity derivatives, resigned today. But he didn't just leave quietly; he wrote a damning Op-Ed piece in the New York Times that shines an arc lamp on Goldman's rapacious, self centered, unbridled greed.
Here is an excerpt:
"I believe I have worked here long enough to understand the trajectory of its culture, its people and its identity. And I can honestly say that the environment now is as toxic and destructive as I have ever seen it. To put the problem in the simplest terms, the interests of the client continue to be sidelined in the way the firm operates and thinks about making money. Goldman Sachs is one of the world’s largest and most important investment banks and it is too integral to global finance to continue to act this way. The firm has veered so far from the place I joined right out of college that I can no longer in good conscience say that I identify with what it stands for." "It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing directors refer to their own clients as “muppets,” sometimes over internal e-mail. Even after the S.E.C., Fabulous Fab, Abacus, God’s work, Carl Levin, Vampire Squids? No humility? I mean, come on. Integrity? It is eroding. I don’t know of any illegal behavior, but will people push the envelope and pitch lucrative and complicated products to clients even if they are not the simplest investments or the ones most directly aligned with the client’s goals? Absolutely. Every day, in fact." "These days, the most common question I get from junior analysts about derivatives is, “How much money did we make off the client?” It bothers me every time I hear it, because it is a clear reflection of what they are observing from their leaders about the way they should behave. Now project 10 years into the future: You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that the junior analyst sitting quietly in the corner of the room hearing about “muppets,” “ripping eyeballs out” and “getting paid” doesn’t exactly turn into a model citizen." |
I'v been in the financial industry for 30 plus years. I've seen it all, however, never have I seen it as bad as this. The outright and officially condoned fraud, theft and criminality has run rampant. It has infected our entire economy and worse, it has corrupted and corroded our policy because so many high level policy posts are held by former Goldman employees or employees of other Wall Street firms that practice the same sort of corrupt, predator capitalism as Goldman did (does).
It has to stop. Hopefully this will be a wakeup call, however, I am perhaps too jaded. I am a skeptic. After the shock of this goes away, it will be business as usual, I'm sure. Wall Street has a long history of this sort of thing. It'll be hard to change.
"Wall Street has a long history of this sort of thing"
ReplyDeleteactually greg - no. predatory selling of "time-bomb" products is a recent phenomenon - as equity head, i'm sure you used to take your clients to nightclubs, gave them some girls and a few lines to make them happy but sold them preferential products or securities. after all, the last major scandals on wall street were actually about preferential treatment of institutional clients ala frank quattrone style, not shafting them with time bombs.
goldman may be a poster child for nefarious financial dealings now but that is NOT what they were founded on - they were the best in M&A, LBO/MBOs and a few other select disciplines for a long time.
my point would be that they are no better or no worse than anyone else - their degradation into this status is just a reflection of what US society in general has degenerated into.
SR-
ReplyDeleteI wrote that, not Greg. Greg Smith's comments are in italics.
SR,
ReplyDeleteRead Michael Lewis' 'Liars Poker' sounds like the same MO with junk bonds back then ('80's) at Solomon (bankrupted).
Resp,
mike - my mistake..... thanks.
ReplyDeletematt - i know a lot of the folks portrayed in the book. yes, they were a bunch of financial alpha-males but most of them made their money legitimately via bond trading. the main focus was on making money for clients not skinning them.
that's the main difference nowadays - the whole country not just wall street has become a giant shark pond. people aren't interested in making the pie bigger, just killing everyone around the table and grabbing all the pie for themselves.
i agree with most of greg's op-ed - my only point is its not limited to goldman sachs or wall street - predatory shafting is now pervasive throughout the country and society, and in every industry.
The question I have is will Holder's DOJ (or any other regulatory agency) subpoena him? If not, how does this tell us anything that GS's open actions (e.g., Jefferson County) hadn't already?
ReplyDeleteHe doesn't tell us anything we don't already know, you're right about that. However, it's a major defection and perhaps the empire a sign that the Goldman empire is crumbling.
ReplyDeleteFrom St. Lloyd B
ReplyDeletehttp://www.businessinsider.com/lloyd-blankfein-and-gary-cohn-respond-to-greg-smith-letter-2012-3
"goldman may be a poster child for nefarious financial dealings now but that is NOT what they were founded on - they were the best in M&A, LBO/MBOs and a few other select disciplines for a long time."
ReplyDeleteactually GS got their start by fraud.Shenandoah and Blue Ridge investment trusts of the 1920's are still legends.
I've been listening to CNBC all day and now it seems they are trying to subtley cast this guy Smith as a "disguntled employee." I think CNBC's bosses may have heard something from the Goldman brass.
ReplyDeleteWhat this really suggests is the the Occupy movement is right to focus on the issue of greed. It's not just a problem of bad laws, lax regulation and the rest. It's a culture of indecent selfishness and ruthlessness.
ReplyDeleteBut let's not pass the whole buck to the Young Turks. All those young guys with their tough talk about ripping people's eyeballs out? Each one has a boss who has assigned that guy a performance target he probably can't hit unless he rips people's eyeballs out. The boss might think he is a model of propriety and old school decency. But maybe he's just making his underlings do the dirty work?
I'm thinkin' a portrait of George W. and George H. painted on the street outside Goldman's, with a caption that reads "Aim for the Bushes".
ReplyDeleteMike, spot on wrt CNBC ... A true marionette in the financial media. But I will say something possibly controversial ... The relationship between clients and banks is more confrontational than ever. Of course banks took clients to the cleaners over the years, and now it is coming home to roost whereby banks as principal get regularly run over with trades that the street seems to know too much about. None of this is ideal, and is a reflection of the financialisation/skewed incentives within the sector. Why does GS still have clients? Probably because slipping from one shark tank to another produces the same result! Clients are closing the gap on bans, in other words. Once again, not ideal
ReplyDelete