Monday, January 7, 2013

Global Banking Rules Mimic Geneva Convention Rules on War?

commentary by Roger Erickson

Warren Mosler says global banking rules make no sense at all.

Given that supposedly sovereign nations are all in an adaptive race to explore different options, his point seems obvious.

So why do supposedly sovereign nations allow particular industry complexes to make their own rules?

Do the MICC and international-CentralBank-multicomplex [ICBM :) ] mimic one another in contriving rules for waging class war?

Are both extensions of a mindless MERCHANT LOBBY run amok? Are both simply TRUSTS gone supra-national? Since the TRUSTS always make us go bust, why are we currently so distracted by Bust Trusting, instead of the inverse? Are all of us so easily distracted by supposedly uplifting propaganda, or only half of us?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The banks, being a criminal, but legal counterfeiting cartel realize that excessive greed will destroy their racket so they make rules for themselves to limit the looting. Ironically, they can't seem to make their looting scheme stable no matter how hard they try.