When the Attorney General of the United States admits some banks are simply too big to prosecute, it might be time to admit we have a problem -- and that goes for both the financial and justice systems.
Eric Holder made this rather startling confession in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, The Hill reports. It could be a key moment in the debate over whether to do something about the size and complexity of our biggest banks, which have only gotten bigger and more systemically important since the financial crisis.
"I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy," Holder said,according to The Hill. "And I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large."
Holder's comments don't come as a total surprise. His underlings had already made similar confessions to The New York Times last year, after they declined to prosecute HSBC for flagrant, years-long violations of money-laundering laws, out of fear that doing so would hurt the global economy. Lanny Breuer, formerly in charge of doling out the Justice Department's wrist slaps to banks, told Frontlineas much in the documentary "The Untouchables," which aired in January.
Some observers have defended the Justice Department, suggesting that prosecuting law-breaking banks would amount to a death penalty that could upset the financial system and trigger another recession -- although nobody really knows if it would do any such thing. But by not prosecuting law-breaking banks, and confessing to its terror of prosecuting those banks, the Justice Department has waved a big checkered flag to the biggest banks to go ahead and break all of the laws they want.The Huffington Post
Eric Holder Admits Some Banks Are Just Too Big To Prosecute
Mark Gongloff
And these are the institutions that the federal government has delegated its money creation power to?
Holder confirms that both capitalism and democracy have broken down. It looks like the only viable option to preserve democracy, eliminate privilege and reestablish the rule of law is to nationalize the banking system by turning it into a public utility with only government having the money power.
The private sector has demonstrated that it cannot handle the money power responsibly and has grown so large that it cannot be controlled from within or without. It's a herd of rogue elephants on the rampage, where the great beasts have to compete ruthlessly with each other to survive.
Holder confirms that both capitalism and democracy have broken down. It looks like the only viable option to preserve democracy, eliminate privilege and reestablish the rule of law is to nationalize the banking system by turning it into a public utility with only government having the money power.
The private sector has demonstrated that it cannot handle the money power responsibly and has grown so large that it cannot be controlled from within or without. It's a herd of rogue elephants on the rampage, where the great beasts have to compete ruthlessly with each other to survive.
No comments:
Post a Comment