The Washington Post on Sunday ran an article about Virginia's new Senator Tim Kaine and his efforts to reach across the aisle and gain a rapport with opposing members. I like and voted for Tim Kaine, and hope he will make for an effective senator, but this is a very bad start. I'm not sure what world he lives in that leads him to believe that modern Republicans are reasonable people who share anything in common with progressives. The few examples of bipartisan successes his office sited were very minor bills, most of which were on easy subjects such as supporting the troops and directing money towards pets projects that multiple members had in common.
The reality is, as long as today's Republicans have any political power, they simply will not allow government to work for a prosocial purpose. It is not in their partisan interest for the government to do anything other than serve the wealthy and powerful. Calling for bipartisanship in today's political environment is not just naive, but insane. There can be no alternative to eliminating Republicans and captured Democrats from positions of power. Sorry folks, but until this happens, there will be no national improvements; political, economic, or otherwise. The Republican Party has, and always will be, the party of wealthy and corporate power. The only way then, that our country has a chance of surviving, is if the Democratic Party isn't. As the brilliant Frank Rich wrote recently:
"many of the Democratic practitioners barely pay lip service to the ideal of siding with working- and middle-class Americans against the plutocrats of finance and industry. They are too busy rushing to partner with Republicans in servicing the very same corporate accounts."
Its clear now that a great number of members of Congress on both sides of the aisle are sociopaths. They care only about winning re-election and maintaining their status as American elites. For most of them, its never about making good policy for the country. They ignore and in some cases despise the weak and vulnerable in our country who are most in the need of society's assistance. Some of these politicians are Democrats, but the vast majority are Republicans. I fundamentally reject the idea that "most people in Washington are trying to do good." Not only are they clueless on policy, they have no desire to learn anything and use their knowledge to make the country better. Their decisions are driven only by venal political calculus.
Today's divisions between progressives and Republicans are not like those between Cowboys and Giants fans. We are facing a clash between those with a positive vision for the future of the United States, and those who can only angrily look backwards and inwards. I sincerely hope that Senator Kaine does not waste any more of his time in the fruitless cause of cooperation with sociopaths. He will succeed only at tarnishing his good name and assisting the decline of our nation.
10 comments:
As long as campaigns are expensive as they are and privately funded through "contributions," politicians will be corrupted by legalized bribery.
Actually, Hamilton recognized that a republic instead of a popular democracy always involves special interests ruling the roost through wealth and power. He argued that this is OK because competition of special interests, at the time, industrial capital, finance capital and agricultural capital, as well as North and South — would counterbalance each others. "The little people"? No mention of them.
So this is the principle on which America was founded and it will remain so without constitutional reforms that limit the implicit social, political and economic privilege of wealth and power through corruption of the democratic process.
Republicanism is just as antithetical to popular democracy as capitalism because republicanism and capitalism go hand it hand against the "lower" classes.
"There can be no alternative to eliminating Republicans and captured Democrats from positions of power."
Wow. Your way or the highway. You clearly are the only person that knows what is best for this country.
Do you hate democracy?
Bullis_Bear...do you really believe we have a Democracy?
"Bullis_Bear...do you really believe we have a Democracy?"
No. Do you think we should have a "true democracy" or "popular democracy". Whatever term you use.
Nothing is going to happen without getting rid of the corruption of campaign finance by the wealthy and the revolving door linking the upper echelon of the government and private sector.
Given Citizens United that may take a constitutional amendment.
But until it happens America is a country masquerading as a "government of the people, by the people and for the people." That's just BS under the present system.
What's worse is that the elite agenda is to impose "democracy" on the rest of the world so rich and powerful can forever rule the planet based on the privilege that wealth and status convey.
It's probably better than a hereditary system, but "the end of history" as the elite foresees. Heaven forbid.
But it's unlikely to happen with China rising power and allied with Russia against US hegemony. There is no history of Western liberalism in either country and they view Western liberalism as a weak excuse for the rule of the haute bourgeoisie allied with the military.
No, not my way necessarily. Just not theirs, thats for sure! And of course, I love democracy. For some reason some of the other sane democracies have strict limits on campaign contributions, but we dont. This Orwellian world where money=speech can hardly be considered a democracy anyway.
Gatekeeper,
"And of course, I love democracy."
Are you a big supporter of Prop 8 in California?
Bear,
Of course not. Nobody ever said democracy is perfect, especially when tens of millions are being spent on propaganda, as was with the prop 8 case.
"Are you a big supporter of Prop 8 in California?"
Not sure how his answer, either way, helps you make a point.
You can be personally against specific pieces of legislation while still supporting the mechanism that allows all legislation to become law, good and bad alike.
Just Gatekeeper - Money does = speech. If I believe you are the next Thomas Jefferson, and I want to contribute $1 million to your political campaign why should I be prohibited from doing so?
My version of U.S. campaign finance reform in 8 words is: No caps, immediate full disclosure, American citizens only.
Post a Comment