In the spring of 2012, a senior examiner with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York determined that Goldman Sachs had a problem.
Under a Fed mandate, the investment banking behemoth was expected to have a company-wide policy to address conflicts of interest in how its phalanxes of dealmakers handled clients. Although Goldman had a patchwork of policies, the examiner concluded that they fell short of the Fed’s requirements.
That finding by the examiner, Carmen Segarra, potentially had serious implications for Goldman, which was already under fire for advising clients on both sides of several multibillion-dollar deals and allegedly putting the bank’s own interests above those of its customers. It could have led to closer scrutiny of Goldman by regulators or changes to its business practices.
Before she could formalize her findings, Segarra said, the senior New York Fed official who oversees Goldman pressured her to change them. When she refused, Segarra said she was called to a meeting where her bosses told her they no longer trusted her judgment. Her phone was confiscated, and security officers marched her out of the Fed’s fortress-like building in lower Manhattan, just 7 months after being hired.The Raw Story
New York Fed fired examiner who refused to go soft on Goldman Sachs: report
Jake Bernstein, ProPublica
Sound like fascism to you? Oh, right, under fascism she would have been disappeared instead of just fired for doing her job in a way that proved inconvenient for TPTB.
2 comments:
I'm SHOCKED!!! SHOCKED to find out there's gambling going on in this casino!
kleptocracy;
it's not coming ... it arrived decades ago
Post a Comment