30 years ago some scientists working on cold fusion claimed to have achieved it, but the US government got three American companies to check it out whose scientists were waiting for huge research grants for studying hot fusion and so they discredited the new technology. Some of these scientists have since been taken to court and successfully sued but you never got to hear about this in our corporate owned media. Big business just wants the oil pumps to keep running. Ever since cold fusion got discredited scientists from all over the world have been unable to get research grants.
Just think if Low Energy Nuclear Reaction, as it is called, had been developed all those years back, the Middle East could have been left alone, millions wouldn't be dead, and ISIS wouldn't exist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLcSE0bmvug
David Knight talks to Robert George of Brillouin Energy Corp, about LENR - Low Energy Nuclear Reaction technology that the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has said “could revolutionize energy production and storage...[and] produce the greatest transformation of the battlefield for US forces since the transition from horsepower to gasoline power.”
Replacing an petroleum based economy with an abundant, compact, clean (no emission, no radiation, no pollution) energy generation system would be disruptive not only to competing forms of energy generation, but to the central banking system based upon the petrodollar. It would also decentralize energy control, removing our dependency on a centralized power grid
We look at the state of the art in what has been labeled “cold fusion” technology and at the opposition from vested money & political interests who don’t want to see this disruptive technology come to fruition
3 comments:
"Replacing an petroleum based economy with an abundant, compact, clean (no emission, no radiation, no pollution) energy generation system would be disruptive not only to competing forms of energy generation, but to the central banking system based upon the petrodollar. It would also decentralize energy control, removing our dependency on a centralized power grid"
How could you not be all in favor of this Cold Fusion discovery, assuming it's not a hoax?
Cold fusion or any sort of practical fusion would be GREAT but my guess is it'll have to be hot fusion.
there is no conspiracy, it is just a mix of funding problems and paradigm conservatism.
The guilty people are just the endangered academic, and the coward followers of media, politics, and of course the scientists who refused to lose their career to defend what they know as true.
For a good descrptions I advise few books:
1- Excess heat by Charles Beaudette, the best history book on LENR, which raise well the question of calorimetry and epistemology
2- Edmund storms "the science of LENR", and all his article by the way (he is a great reviewer)
and an article by Roland Benabou :
http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/REP_4_BW_nolinks_corrected%201.pdf
on Groupthink
you can connect that to two comments by LENR insiders,
Edmund Storms about LANL
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2365-Self-Interest-and-LENR-Edmund-Storms/
and recently Robert Godes
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3501-Robert-E-Godes-why-Cold-Fusion-is-so-opposed-by-physicists/?postID=29489#post29489
the oil companies have well worked to replicate LENR, they have published, in the limit of their public image.
Without Internet and Capitalism, LENR would be dead today.
Without hidden scientist in military and national labs, abusing of their position to make experiment despite the directive of their bosses, it would be dead too.
Post a Comment