…This could be summarized as simply saying there is no framework for macroeconomics. Frameworks, like string theory and quantum field theory, do two things: they tell you how to start looking at a problem, and they represent a shorthand for capturing the empirical successes of the field. My first criticism above says that string theory is a framework, so you can't make an analogy with macro which doesn't have a framework. My second criticism above says that until you have a working framework, you should be skeptical of any "natural experiments" because the interpretation of the natural experiments change with the framework.Information Transfer Economics
In spite of this, for the most part I liked Romer's take on macroeconomics and I think he delivered some powerful arguments.…
Of phlogiston and frameworks
Jason Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment