An economics, investment, trading and policy blog with a focus on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We seek the truth, avoid the mainstream and are virulently anti-neoliberalism.
Showing posts with label military history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military history. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 7, 2018
Brad DeLong — Nikita Sergeyevitch Khrushchev to John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Brad DeLong pulls up couple of letters from the files that are relevant now.
Grasping Reality
Nikita Sergeyevitch Khrushchev to John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Brad DeLong | Professor of Economics, UCAL Berkeley
Tuesday, July 24, 2018
Tony Norfield — Indian Boots on the Ground
British policy was to depend upon alliances with others, rather than to maintain a large standing army itself. So it was important to be able to draw upon a force of colonial troops when needed, including for the policing of the British Raj.
Important though they were for British power, Indian troops commonly faced racial discrimination, were looked down upon by white officers and were often used as cannon fodder, while also being given worse grade arms and equipment than regular British troops. Attractive as a cheap military resource for the Brits, these men could nevertheless see enlistment in the army as a reasonable option. There was regular pay and regular food, something not always available in the Indian economy dominated by British Empire interests….Still going on in a modified form. Now they are mostly proxies and mercenaries rather than subjects.
Of course, the same goes for the "cannon fodder" recruited from domestic resources on the same basis, given the alternatives at the low end of the socio-economic scale.
Economics of Imperialism
Indian Boots on the Ground
Tony Norfield
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
John Helmer — The Battle Of Aleppo, The Battle Of Dresden, The Battle Of Masada And The Battle Of Bosworth Field
Dances with Bears
John Helmer
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Bruce Hoffman — ISIS has studied the past successes of terrorism all too well
History lesson.
Terrorism is traditional political-military tactic of the weaker party to conflict. It's inexpensive, readily available, simple to implement, and history shows that it works. It also harms a lot less people and causes less damage than conventional military operations for political ends.
Aeon
ISIS has studied the past successes of terrorism all too well
Bruce Hoffman, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Security Studies and a senior fellow at the US Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center
Aeon
ISIS has studied the past successes of terrorism all too well
Bruce Hoffman, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Security Studies and a senior fellow at the US Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)