Here is a 2025 study linking the militarization of police with increasing violence.
NEW DIRECTIONS IN PROTEST POLICING
EDWARD R. MAGUIRE*
INTRODUCTION
On August 9, 2014, a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri shot and killed an unarmed 18-year-old African-American man named Michael Brown.1While the details of the shooting are disputed, for many black residents in the area, the incident represented the culmination of a long line of abusive police practices targeted primarily toward African Americans.2 The controversial shooting triggered months of mass demonstrations in the St. Louis area.3 The protests intensified on November 24, 2014 when the grand jury decided not to indict the officer.4 The way area police departments responded to the protests was viewed by critics as heavy-handed and overly militarized.5 An after-action assessment sponsored by the Justice Department’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) concluded that police relied on “ineffective and inappropriate strategies and tactics” that had the “unintended consequence of escalating rather than diminishing tensions.”6Proper policing controls while diminishing violence, while policing by paramilitaries escalates violence. And militarized policing is expensive to boot.
Militarized policing needs to be defunded, and guaranteed immunity of police officers ended. Reform may not be possible under current arrangements, e.g., owing to police unions, in which case police departments will have to disestablished and new "safety force" organizations constituted.
This was the thinking of the majority of the Minneapolis City Council in deciding to end the current police department since attempts at reform had failed. The ensuing disaster could have been avoided. This incident was not chiefly the result of "a few bad apples," but existing policy and culture. If something vital cannot be reformed, then it must be terminated and restructured under new design, fresh policy and competent management.
Portland Mercury — Blogtown
Research Says Violent Cops Cause Violent Protests
Matt Baume
5 comments:
a 2025 study? How about 2015..
So how come police violence in the UK is a fraction of that in the US, but we still have violent protests in the UK?
Research Says Corrupt Politicians, Righteous Activists and Soccer Fans, Cause Violent Protests
Because there are violent people everywhere Ralph....
Happens when one side in a dialectic exchange becomes beyond frustrated as the other side will not accept the opposing Thesis... the one side becomes physically active aggressive in view of their Thesis not being accepted by the other side...
MMT does this via passive aggressive... no one is accepting their Thesis so they are all going around bearish for years saying the whole th8ng is going to crash if you don’t listen to them, blah blah blah, etc...
Christendumbs Hell Doctrine is passive aggressive like this... as if you don’t accept their thesis you are going to go to hell after you die and be tormented eternally blah blah...
Same thing...
The aggression comes with this methodology... active or passive...
No one in that methodology ever makes an adjustment...
“The aggression comes with this methodology..”
Yep we know your metrology, the one where you will throw everyone who you consider art degree morons in jail if you have the chance. Aggressive it is.
Post a Comment