Showing posts with label history of finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history of finance. Show all posts

Friday, December 8, 2017

Timothy B. Lee — Is Bitcoin a bubble? Here’s what two bubble experts told us

Is Bitcoin a bubble? It's a natural question to ask—especially after Bitcoin's price shot up from $12,000 to $15,000 this week.
So we decided to ask a couple of experts on bubbles what they thought: Brent Goldfarb is a business professor at the University of Maryland, and William Deringer is a historian at MIT. Both have done research on the history and economics of bubbles, and they talked to Ars by phone this week as Bitcoin continues its surge.
Both academics saw clear parallels between the bubbles they've studied and Bitcoin's current rally. Bubbles tend to be driven either by new technologies (like railroads in 1840s Britain or the Internet in the 1990s) or by new financial innovations (like the financial engineering that produced the 2008 financial crisis). Bitcoin, of course, is both a new technology and a major financial innovation.
Ars Technica
Is Bitcoin a bubble? Here’s what two bubble experts told us
Timothy B. Lee

See also
The number of people with Coinbase accounts has gone from 5.5 million in January to 13.3 million at the end of November
Coinbase is having difficulty handling the volume.

Business Standard
Coinbase exchange at the heart of the bitcoin frenzy
Nathaniel Popper | NYT | San Francisco 

also
High volatility.

Reuters
Bitcoin tumbles after dramatic gains ahead of futures launch

Also

Jesse's Café Américain
Peak Monetary Goofiness: One Thousand People Own 40% of Bitcoin Market
Frank Chaparro





Saturday, June 14, 2014

Tim Johnson — Reciprocity and the difference between usury and interest



History of interest in relation to usury and risk compensation. A bit wonkish, but important in that it relates to the debate over inequality. It's also interesting from the historical perspective on the development of finance.
We can interpret interest in two ways, as a means of "growing" ones wealth, which would be usurious in the Scholastic sense, or as a compensation. If it is a compensation the wealth is not expected to grow, that is, Piketty's whole argument becomes somewhat meaningless.
Magic, Maths, and Money — The Relationship between Science and Finance
Reciprocity and the difference between usury and interest
Tim Johnson | Lecturer in Financial Mathematics at Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh