SRW makes a case that our economic problems are at bottom political. I would agree.
But if we want to change the behavior of the polity, it’s not enough to argue over clever policies that, if implemented, might do the trick. We’ve got to change its preferences, which means either buying off the median influencer, or changing her identity via political struggle. Alternatively, we can wait until what are now problems of aggregate demand morph into supply problems (after people become unemployable and capital decays), or into threats of political and social unrest. The median influencer may change her views if tight supply makes goods costly despite fiscomonetary conservatism. Or if her neighborhood is on fire. But I’d prefer we avoid all that, and take a more proactive route.
In the meantime, what we have to recognize is that what we are experiencing is not a technical failure. It is not “magneto trouble”. We, collectively, are making a choice. The task before us is to change our mind.Read it at Interfluidity
Depression is a choice
by Steve Randy Waldman
2 comments:
Why does a country need to go into debt to get more of its own money? Crazy.
Citizens its time, take back the money minting machine. Forget the means of production, the Means of Interaction is more important. Control of those little labor-tickets is the true way of reaching an egalitarian society. Take back the Means of Interaction!
Revolt!
See the series beginning here: http://www.correntewire.com/a_meta_layer_for_restoring_democracy_and_open_society_part_one_conceptual_foundations
Post a Comment