Lars Syll — Piketty and the neoclassical heart of darkness

Why Matt Rognlie's neoclassical approach fails — neoclassical models cannot deal with the emergence that knowledge involves in a complex adaptive system like a modern society and its economy. Knowledge-induced scale effects vitiate neoclassical assumptions about diminishing returns to scale.

Piketty and the neoclassical heart of darkness
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University

Lars P. Syll — Paul Romer’s & Paul Krugman’s dangerous idea

In Paul Romer’s Endogenous Technological Change (1990) knowledge is made the most important driving force of growth. Knowledge (ideas) are presented as the locomotive of growth — but as Allyn Young, Piero Sraffa and others had shown already in the 1920s, knowledge is also something that has to do with increasing returns to scale and therefore not really compatible with neoclassical economics with its emphasis on decreasing returns to scale.

Increasing returns generated by non-rivalry between ideas is simply not compatible with pure competition and the simplistic invisible hand dogma. That is probably also the reason why neoclassical economists have been so reluctant to embrace the theory wholeheartedly.

Paul Romer’s & Paul Krugman’s dangerous idea
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmö University