Showing posts with label mujahideen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mujahideen. Show all posts

Sunday, October 2, 2016

Paul Antonopoulos — Al-Nusra Shariah spokesperson endorses Syrian White Helmets as mujahideen

In the latest video, an al-Nusra spokesman endorses the Nobel Peace prize candidates, the White Helmets, as mujahideen.

Abdallah Muhammad al Muhaysini, is a popular Saudi cleric who has relocated to Syria illegally and became the Army of Conquests Shariah Court spokesperson.

The White Helmets are seen as humanitarians, but the relationship between them and internationally recognized terrorist groups like al-Nusra is ignored.

Abdullah Muhaysni says the White Helmets "are no different from the Mujahideen".…
This is not new news for those who have bothered to look into, as we have previously reported here at MNE. But the White Helmets are being touted as candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize. Well, I guess after awarding the prize to Obama, anything makes sense in that fantasy world.
Almasdar News
Al-Nusra Shariah spokesperson endorses Syrian White Helmets as mujahideen
Paul Antonopoulos

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

The Moderate Syrian Opposition Are Terrorists from All over the World — Desislava Pateva Interviews Mohammed Ibrahim


Interview with a Syrian who also has Bulgarian citizenship and now lives in Bulgaria. Longish but revealing.

SouthFront
Interview conducted by Desislava Pateva with Mohammed Ibrahim, chairman of the Association of Syrians in Bulgaria; Originally appeared at A-specto, translated by Borislav exclusively for SouthFront

Sunday, August 21, 2016

Finian Cunningham — Killing Russians – Ex-CIA Chief Clarifies US Duplicity

Morell’s macho performance on CBS calling for Russia and Iran to «pay a price» for their intervention in Syria had the obvious purpose of advertising his application for a Clinton appointment.
But beyond his squalid self-serving motivations, Morell unwittingly performed a service to public disclosure on what US involvement in Syria is all about.
His candid comments can only have one conclusion. The US is prepared to openly side with terrorists in Syria by arming and directing militants to kill Russians. In short, the US is on the side of the terrorists.
For many observers of the Syrian conflict this is not a revelation. Since the onset of the conflict in March 2011, informed observers have known that the US and its NATO and regional allies have infiltrated mercenary groups into the country in a covert war for regime change against President Bashar al-Assad and his government.
Despite Western fictive narratives about the anti-government militants being competitively divided between «moderate rebels» and «extremists», it is understood that Washington and its allies have been waging their covert war by secretly and indiscriminately supporting the full gamut of illegally armed groups, or terrorists.
The strategy is to turn Syria in Russia's Vietnam with mujahideen proxy "freedom fighters" on the way to ousting Assad, driving Russia form the Middle Easts, as the US did in Afghanistan by inserting mujahideen under Osama Bin Laden to drive the USSR out of Afghanistan and fatally wound it. 

What could possibly go wrong with this plan? It worked so well for Zbig.

US-Russia.org
Killing Russians – Ex-CIA Chief Clarifies US Duplicity
Finian Cunningham

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Rakesh Krishna Simha — How the West used radical Islam and unleashed global terror

Western nations have backed fundamentalist forces at the expense of secular, nationalist Muslims. With western funding and support, the Islamic fringe has come to occupy the mainstream.…
How it all began.
“The British Empire had an overprotective attitude toward Islam,” writes Nu’man Abd Al-Wahid of the Lebanon-based Al-Akhbar.

Considering that Britain was one of the prime culprits in the destabilisation of Iran in the 1950s and is behind the devastation of Iraq, Libya and Syria in more recent times, one would be tempted to take the view the British are anti-Muslim. But in fact they are only opposed to nationalist Muslims and the moderate middle classes.
Al-Wahid explains: “When the Empire began to consolidate its lordship over the Arab world after World War I, it partnered with Saudi Wahhabis and the Muslim Brotherhood. The trends these movements represented were not so much ‘invented’ by the British but favoured and promoted.
"Before the British allowed the Wahhabis to establish themselves in Riyadh in 1901, they were an isolated, exiled cult in the Basra region known as ‘Kuwait’. With further support from the Empire, the Wahhabis expanded into the western part of the Arabian peninsula in 1924 and 1925.”
The British advocated the Muslim Brotherhood brand of Islam rather than the traditional moderate Islam as practised by the oldest university in the Islamic world, Al-Azhar.

“The British Empire...heroically and selflessly defended Islam, even if al-Azhar, the traditional bastion of Islamic learning in the world, didn’t comprehend this urgency. By the time these two major trends of Islamism strategically coalesced in the 1950s to meet the challenge of third world independence and socialism, the Americans had embraced the British Empire’s imperialist strategy.”
“This embrace meant bringing British puppets, such as the al-Saud clan of Saudi Arabia and the Thani clan of Qatar, under its protective umbrella. This American appropriation of the puppets had initially gained doctrinal credibility through the Eisenhower doctrine and extended all the way until the 1980s to support the Islamist mercenaries, or mujahideen, against the Soviets in the 1980s.”
Downhill from there.

During the Carter administration, under the influence of Zbigniew Brzezinski, the US began to employ Wahhabi, Salafi, Takfiri mujahideen as "freedom fighters" and used them subsequently in  proxy wars — until the mujahideen turned on them. But the mujahideen presented too good an opportunity to give up entirely so the US still incorporates them.
However, the desire to play cynical geopolitical games is too strong in the West. In most cases western politicians and generals are way over their heads in events they cannot begin to understand, let alone control. Meanwhile, the battle is spilling over into the streets of Europe and occasionally the United States. The West’s ‘Freudian Bargain’ is clearly coming unstuck.
Russia & India Report
How the West used radical Islam and unleashed global terror
Rakesh Krishnan Simha

Thursday, August 18, 2016

Sputnik — Is China Preparing for Military Involvement in Syrian Crisis?

Guan Youfei, director of the Office for International Military Cooperation of China's Central Military Commission, met Syrian Defense Minister Fahad Jassim al-Freij, Xinhua reported….
China is concerned about a militant group from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in Syria. The militants will pose a threat to Chinese national security if they return to China.…
Think that Russia and China might be ripped at the US for creating, funding and arming the mujahideen to fight proxy wars?

Thursday, November 26, 2015

Dan Sanchez — They Sow The Cyclone - We Reap The Blowback



How the US created jihadism beginning over forty years ago under the aegis of Henry Kissinger and then Zbigniew Brzezinski down to the present. A sordid tale of intrigue, deceit, and mayhem. You can't make this stuff up.

AntiWar
They Sow The Cyclone - We Reap The Blowback
Dan Sanchez
Also published at DanSanchez.me and Medium.com