Showing posts with label recycling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recycling. Show all posts

Monday, July 31, 2017

Sputnik International — The Circular Economy That Could Save Countries Thousands, Reduce Waste

Unilever, Renault, Google and Nike are some of the companies that have begun moving towards a circular business model.

It's not just businesses that are adopting these strategies, cities are also looking at how they can drastically cut waste.
London, Amsterdam and Paris are all looking at how they can shift from a circular economy, hoping to reuse products, parts and materials which produce no waste and pollution, and use fewer new resources and energy.
Sputnik International
The Circular Economy That Could Save Countries Thousands, Reduce Waste

Monday, September 26, 2016

Jack LIfton on recycling rare earths

In this interview, Jack explains that it is very important to recycle electric vehicle battery materials as we do not produce enough lithium, cobalt and spherical graphite to make even a fraction of the vehicles that Elon Musk’s Tesla plans to manufacture in the year 2018 alone.
Investor Intel
Lifton prepares for the Mines and Money Show in Toronto
ht MRW in the comments

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Frans van Houten — The Circular Revolution

Just as ecosystems reuse everything in an efficient and purposeful cycle, a “circular” economic system would ensure that products were designed to be part of a value network, within which the reuse and refurbishment of products, components, and materials would ensure the continual re-exploitation of resources.
Project Syndicate
The Circular Revolution
Frans van Houten | Chief Executive Officer of Royal Philips
Like all major transitions in human history, the shift from a linear to a circular economy will be a tumultuous one. It will feature pioneers and naysayers, victories and setbacks. But, if businesses, governments, and consumers each do their part, the Circular Revolution will put the global economy on a path of sustainable long-term growth – and, 500 years from now, people will look back at it as a revolution of Copernican proportions.
Paying attention to land (natural resources, ecology) as a crucial economic factor that is finite and fragile. Is private property a sufficient incentive for appropriate stewardship? Not under the current institutional arrangements that promote unlimited growth and profit based on freely exploiting resources. 

The real tragedy of the commons is turning out to be overuse, depletion and degradation due to privatization under contemporary economic liberalism (neoliberalism) as a socio-economic and political theory. The problem is traceable to power structures, institutional arrangements, negative externality, adverse selection and perverse incentives that market-based theories do not take into account in pursuing innovation and efficiency based on the assumption of (near) perfect competition.