An economics, investment, trading and policy blog with a focus on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We seek the truth, avoid the mainstream and are virulently anti-neoliberalism.
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Why the Paralyzing Fear Over Exploring Options?
Here's a curious update. The inscrutable secret to the evolving universe is no longer "64" but rather "welcome the symbiosis going on behind the curtain."
Why? First, Warren Mosler famously sums up nearly everything by asking "How do you get people to explore their options?"
Historically, the answer is "Let their kids and grandchildren outrun their Luddite parents." As Max Planck and countless others have observed, paradigms change as cemetery plots get filled.
The obvious corollary, summarized by people as diverse as Clausewitz, Wallace & Darwin, is that "tempo" counts, and that surviving species or groups are those who manage to further accelerate adaptive rate, not just adaptations. Overwhelming evidence suggests that the race to accelerate adaptive rate is what tunes everything about complex systems, down to the lifespan of their regenerated, recombinant components (e.g. us).
If any and all forms of recombination constitute the answer - whether quantum, chemical, molecular, sexual or cultural-recombination - then why all the sturm and drang over change? How did the most advanced culture in known history come to be paralyzed with fear over something as trivially welcome as extra spare time, aka "Unemployment?" Here are just a very few of countless examples - choosing some of the more interesting ones.
Unemployment In A World Without Jobs
Robots will steal your job, but that’s OK: how to survive the economic collapse and be happy
Future of Work: Custom Printed Bodies and the End of the 9-to-5 Job
Are you only worried about the Luddites momentarily surrounding your house, occupying your republic, and uselessly constraining your options? Or are you actually seriously worried about what humans could possible do with additional free time and accumulating resources? The only proper response is to ask your maturing kids & grandchildren how worried they are, as they politely back away and vote with their feet. As situations change, new adaptations in recombinant systems arise from starting points about 5 layers beneath the surface of the existing processes. It's called "selection" - and it's how adaptive systems explore their infinite cloud of emerging options. That demand for selection constitutes their Traveling Entrepreneur Task. Don't fret, it's always been this way. Our kids & grandkids will effortlessly move on to explore the NEW OPTIONS exposed as they're freed from our OLD CONSTRAINTS.
I'll post the same symbiosis comment here that was posted to the Seeking Alpha story.
***
For Pete's sake! Coolies & muleskinners once rioted because the auto was going to un-employ workers providing other means of local transportation.
20 years later no one remembered what all the sturm & drang was about.
Those that find better things to do with their time will have a job. Those earliest to see better things for people to do, will be in policy positions.
How's that different from anything in the past? Only the details and scale or organization change.
Can you imagine the first eukaryotic cell, 3 billion years ago, arguing with it's distributed workforce of molecules & organelles?
Molecular Workforce: "If we allow those robotic mitochondria in, to automate all oxidation & electron transfer, then we'll all be out of a job. It'll be different this time! DOWN WITH SYMBIOSIS!!!"
History: "Sure was different, alright, but not along the dimensions you imagined. Now we have orders of magnitude more and more diverse 'workers' in millions of species - and whole ecologies - that none of us could have possibly imagined. Get over it."
The story of evolution is non-stop return on coordination.
It's not like it wasn't always this way. The tools invented the last 3.5 billions years allowed selection of the species & cultures existing today.
Ergo, those human cultures & nations that figure out cheaper/faster/better ways to do MORE with emerging tools ... will survive.
The Luddites won't - one way or another.
Will Rogers nailed it pretty well. Virtually sitting in the road will only get your current avatar 'dissed & ignored .. nowadays by a virtual robot truck. :)
Bottom of this rabbit hole is a simple truth. Human capital is more valuable than any other form of capital. It's better to horde coordination capabilities rather than any static commodity.
Yes, we as a people currently show worrying signs of doing nothing with our commodity assets than keeping our compatriots from using them in innovative ways. We explicitly discussed 2000 years ago that the Midas Touch only kills. Obviously, we knew that implicitly over 100,000 years ago, or we wouldn't have become an increasingly social species. Not to worry. Our kids & grandchildren will forget our limitations as fast as we allow both ourselves and - increasingly, the lagging adaptive rate of our customs - to populate cemetaries, real or virtual.
Yes, how we educate our youth is where we'll burden or accelerate their ability to explore their emerging options. OpenSource innovation looks like one of our few rays of sunshine at present. Forget standardized Luddite testing, get your kids more practice at group coordination. Americans used to have a "can-do" attitude. We've simply exchanged it for a "can-not" message from faux economists denying the existance of public fiat. You know the answer: coordinate, then ask the faux economists "whose your Employer now?"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Roger,
Perhaps it is because these options have to be explored by the govt sector and many libertarians have a BIG problem with that... the libertarians would look at it as "big government" and this goes against their grain so to speak...
rsp,
You're saying that Libetarians have an issue with teamwork? That's all "government" is. Why do we talk like government is anyone other than us?
Do you suppose there were any Libertarians in tribal systems? Or are Libs merely that segment of hermits unable to yet mesh with our supra-tribal population densities? :)
Lots of people consider so-called Caucasians as the polar bears or hermits of the human species - bristly and not adapted to living with population density. That triggers an obvious question. Are there any Libertarians who aren't at least partly Caucasian?
As long as we keep thinking we have run out of resources AND we can't do nothing about it, there is nothing we can do.
This is the fundamental ideology which is surrounding luddites, libertarians or social darwinists of any kind. Not only that, but there is an active propaganda war ongoing to keep it that way.
Basically they revolve around saying is that "we live in the best of the possible worlds" and we have run out of options to explore (how silly is that) (aka we have 'run out of money').
No self-governance, no real entrepreneur spirit (I'm not talking about 'rentier' spirit) and no faith in human kind. Nihilism has taken over the world, and over our institutions and social fabric. And this nihilism take-over will descend us into chaos because there is a lot of social darwinists difficulting any progress via exploring of new options.
"we're out of money"
Ignacio,
I think we can make the case in view of the evidence:
1. No physical archeological record that this is true in Roman Empire;
2. No documentary record of this being true in Greek classics;
3. No record that this is true in the Bible;
4. Not true iaw with Darwinian group selection;
5. Not true according to the truth of quantitative mathematics;
6. Not true according to basic human ability for logic and ability to discern contradiction;
7 etc...
What do they have? What is "on their side?" They've got nothing...
These morons have to be exposed and rebuked repeatedly....
Rsp,
LOL accurate and funny Ignacio.
You should call your opening line "quantum circular reasoning" and attribute it to MC Escher's avatar!
8. Not true iaw the laws of the operations of closed systems;
You're saying that Libetarians have an issue with teamwork?
Yes, but is the team inclusive or exclusive?
That's all "government" is.
Government is the locus of power in an organized group. As soon as there is a defined locus of power, there is jostling for power, aka "politics."
Why do we talk like government is anyone other than us?
Because we are far from an homogenous group, and it is the aim of TPTB to keep it that way since it benefits their agenda.
Simpson and Bowles are on CNBC right now (moronfest) with Lloyd Blankfein and Steve Lesiman....
Lloyd Blankfein is clueless too!
Leisman: "We're borrowing money from China"
Moron.
Bowles: "Paying off the debt is the promised land"
Lloyd Blankfein is clueless too!
I don't believe that for a minute. Lloyd Blankfein, Jamie Dimon, etc. are foxes setting up to run the henhouse globally. They know exactly what they are doing in promoting austerity. The houses of Goldman and Morgan have been in the controllers' seat too long for it to be an accident or coincidence.
'Government is the locus of power in an organized group. As soon as there is a defined locus of power, there is jostling for power, aka "politics."'
Sure Tom, but there's still politics even with a Hermit. You ever heard people arguing with themselves? :)
Blankfein: "We need more political pressure on Washington..."
Leisman: "Is the Fed enabling all the deficit spending by purchasing all of the Treasury Securities?"
This is unbelievable...
Tom,
wrt Blankfein: I'll try to find the video seg and post it up this eve... he is a MORON... dumb as a stump...
tho opinions vary... I'll post it up and we can check it out... 4 raging morons: Leisman/Blankfein/Bowles/Simpson...
Now Tyler Matheson is reporting that Blankfein said solving the deficit would be great stimulus....
You wont believe it!
Now Tyler Matheson is reporting that Blankfein said solving the deficit would be great stimulus....
Delivering SS to Wall Street would be great stimulus, , which is what "solving the deficit" means to LB and JD — until the inevitable happens — but that's a new opportunity for them to practice disaster capitalism.
Post a Comment