Thursday, August 13, 2015

Evgenia Pismennaya and Ilya Arkhipov — Fractures Form Inside Russia’s Central Bank as Recession Deepens

In his first stint as a top Russian central bank official in the early 1990s, Dmitry Tulin saw how flooding cheap credit to dying industrial giants delivered hyperinflation instead of growth.
Now back as the bank’s monetary chief, Tulin, 59, has argued internally for easier credit and more targeted lending to industry to revive an economy driven into recession by plunging oil prices and U.S. and European sanctions, say officials who have attended meetings with him. They discussed internal bank deliberations on condition of anonymity.
While Tulin isn’t pushing for a repeat of the failed Soviet-style policies of the early 1990s, his challenge to the orthodox approach of his boss at the central bank, Governor Elvira Nabiullina, underscores the tension facing Russia’s economic policy makers as they try to steady an economy battered largely by forces beyond their control.

“The external environment is very difficult: geopolitical tensions, sanctions, rising capital outflows, a sharp drop in economic activity, a strengthening of restrictive and regulatory moves by the authorities,” said Alexei Kudrin, a former finance minister who now runs a think tank. “Nabiullina, an advocate of traditional, market-based policies, is trying as best she can to maintain her balance in this very unstable situation.”
While Russian officials say publicly the worst of the economic turmoil has passed, they say in private that the situation is fragile at best and the central bank’s $358 billion in reserves could be drained further if crude prices continue to drop.…
I often take Bloomberg with a grain of salt, but this piece seems reasonably accurate from what I have been reading elsewhere.

Dmitry Tulin was chief of Gosbank, the central bank of the USSR. Elvira Nabiullina is in the Western model of a central banker. Tulin is correct that Russia needs to loosen, but the loosening it needs is chiefly fiscal. Still a central bank has a lot of tools to use in extremis and the Central Bank of Russia should be using them.

Nabiullina did wisely float the ruble almost immediately and that saved the day. Now they need to take some more bold steps to stimulate the economy and diversify it.

However, the issue is not only financial but economic. The funds need to get to the right places. That was the problem in the 1990's with corruption rampant but that situation has lessened through Putin's arm-twisting reforms that shut down the Russian mafia free-wheeling oligarchs and the cowboy capitalism introduced by Western (Harvard) advisors.

Bloomberg Business
Fractures Form Inside Russia’s Central Bank as Recession Deepens
Evgenia Pismennaya and Ilya Arkhipov

2 comments:

mike norman said...

But Tulin wants capital controls and cheap loans to farmers and small business? How does that help? Whose income pays the debt service on those cheap loans?

Tom Hickey said...

Tulin seems to be proposing a central bank lending program for small business that is independent of the policy rate, which is over 10%. I think that Russia is already doing this selectively with large firms it considers vital industries. Russia re-industrializing. They are also expanding agriculture, so supporting farmers makes sense in terms of current policy.

But demand comes either from exports or fiscal. Russia needs to open the fiscal spigot for badly needed social programs instead of running a tight ship supposedly to support the currency. But Nabiullina is a neoliberal central banker and only the Communists in the Duma have figured this out. But they are way in the minority.

I don't see why Russia would need capital controls now when the hot money left long ago, and GS recently rated Russia a buy.