Monday, August 10, 2015

John T. Harvey — Five Reasons Why A National Balanced Budget Amendment Is Lunacy

A constitutional amendment to require a balanced federal budget is once again in the news:
Constitutional convention sparking buzz, but odds still long
As an economist, the only thing I find slightly encouraging about this is the part of the title that reads, “odds still long.” Requiring a balanced federal budget is sheer lunacy and a recipe for disaster. We must do everything in our power to stop these well-intentioned but ill-informed individuals from pushing us down this road to ruin.
There are so many reasons why this is a bad idea, but I’ll limit myself to five. Here’s a summary of why we don’t need a balanced-budget amendment….
John knocks it out of the park. Let's see what the comments look like over there.

Forbes — Pragmatic Economics
Five Reasons Why A National Balanced Budget Amendment Is Lunacy
John T. Harvey | Professor of Economics, Texas Christian University

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks, Tom. Shared on the Facebook MMT intro page.

Random said...

https://www.tes.co.uk/news/school-news/breaking-news/ukip-protests-eu-propaganda-comics-are-sent-schools
EU on top form.

mike norman said...

I believe that without a doubt, a balanced budget amendment will be passed. No question.