Thursday, September 7, 2023

William Mitchell — The tax extreme wealth to increase funds for government spending narrative just reinforces neoliberal framing

Despite the rabble on the Right of politics that marches around driven by conspiracies about government chips in the water supply or Covid vaccines and all the rest of the rot that lot carry on with, the reality is that well-funded Right that is entrenched in the deepest echelons of capital are extremely well organised and strategic, which is why the dominant ideology reflects their preferences. That group appears to be able to maintain a united front which solidifies their effectiveness. By way of contrast, the Left is poorly funded, but more importantly, divided and on important matters appears incapable of breaking free from the fictions and framing that the Right have introduced to further their own agenda. So, the Left is often pursuing causes that appear to be ‘progressive’ and which warm their hearts, but which in reality are just reinforcing the framing that advance the interests of the Right. We saw that again this week with the emergence of the Tax Extreme Wealth movement and with the release of their open letter to the G20 Heads of State – G20 Leaders must tax extreme wealth. This ia the work of a group which includes the so-called Patriotic Millionaires, Oxfam, Millionaires for Humanity, Earth4All and the Institute for Policy Studies. It demonstrates perfectly how these progressive movements advance dialogue and framing which actually end up undermining their own ambitions.
I am not sure whether "right" and "left" are useful descriptors. As Bill observes, the positions are conflated and the real differences of positions are obscured. The differences are in rhetoric only. There are strong cultural and institutional biases operative that act as hidden assumptions influencing the framing in a neoliberal direction. 

What Bill has called "neoliberal tendencies" go unnoticed, even among some MMT proponents, as Bill has also pointed out in his comment section over the years. Escaping the framing as a set of hidden assumptions is difficult and most don't make it out of the box. We see this is a strong monetarist bias in econ and finance as well as politics, for example.

William Mitchell — Modern Monetary Theory
The tax extreme wealth to increase funds for government spending narrative just reinforces neoliberal framing
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia

5 comments:

Matt Franko said...

“ I am not sure whether "right" and "left" are useful descriptors.”

lol… well they are surely useful if you are politically biased … which Bill certainly is to the left… which still shouldn’t be a problem as idt political orientation should prevent proper technical understanding .. but maybe it does? 🤔

You keep blaming it on the figure of speech “framing!” …

These people are all making a reification error and think the figure of speech “money!” is REAL and we have to obtain it before we can spend it… and ofc then it follows we can measure it, quantify it, etc… just like anything real…

The main problem is that this reification error continues uncorrected…

Matt Franko said...

“ The differences are in rhetoric only. ”

So what? Rhetoric is well used in the dialogic method

https://jerichowriters.com/what-is-a-rhetorical-device-and-how-to-use-them/#:~:text=A%20rhetorical%20device%20(otherwise%20known,think%20in%20a%20certain%20way.

“ A rhetorical device (otherwise known as a stylistic device, a persuasive device or more simply, rhetoric) is a technique or type of language that is used by a speaker or an author for the purpose of evoking a particular reaction from the listener or reader or persuading them to think in a certain way. “

This is textbook Art degree 101 …

Both sides are allowed to use it…

What is unfair about it?

Do you think they should cancel the Chiefs game from last night because they lost and the Lions went in there and won? And the Chiefs were supposed to win?

You are in a dialogic contest and the other side have been and are still winning…

mike norman said...

"Do you think they should cancel the Chiefs game from last night because they lost and the Lions went in there and won? And the Chiefs were supposed to win?"

What a shocker of a game!

Matt Franko said...

You gotta play the game Mike!

All the Chiefs hype was making me sick to my stomach… glad to see Detroit take them back down to earth…

Hey btw I think Aaron Rodgers is going to really help the Jets this year.. won’t be able to sleep on the Jets either.,,

Matt Franko said...

“ the Right of politics that marches around driven by conspiracies about government chips in the water supply or Covid vaccines ”

Yo, That’s LIBERTARIANS …. not “the right”…